Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BI
Posts
1
Comments
88
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Try adding a HDMI dummy plug. Older Intel NUC's (8th gen and earlier) have an issue that's fixed (but always seems to come back...) where they don't like functioning headlessly (without a display connected.)

    Edit: Also, make sure your BIOS is uptodate.

  • The house is not occupied and there is access to the crawlspace.

    My main concern is that I'm not sure a concrete foundation can be built underneath the house. Since it has the addition which a concrete foundation, the house cannot be lifted. The weight bearing concrete would have to be built upto the level of the house...which I'm not sure is possible.

    A basement would be amazing.

  • Well...except to meet code for wood foundation you must use treated wood (usually treated with some kind of copper arsenic) which is not great for the environment (both the production and usage).

  • I'm sure I need to add way more info...just not sure what's relevant.

    Crawlspace. There are piers....but they appear to be wood. Wood piers in the ground, connect to wood posts/beams above ground. As expected the wood has started to rot and the whole wood foundation needs to be replaced.

    This is in the PNW and earthquakes are possible, thus my preference for a concrete foundation(rather not get into the debate about how house would be effected from earthquake).

    This is not a foundation repair situation...this is a foundation replacement situation.

    What else can I tell you?

  • The red is fully concrete. That part of the house was an addition.

    The black part is entirely a wood foundation. It's the stupidest thing.

    Edit: just realized what you were commenting. The image is a top down of the house perimeter.

  • Lol. You are ignoring your own article source...but I'll leave you to your incorrect understanding.

    I'll also note that the only source you've provided has no data or supporting research paper behind it. Just an article.

  • The first line of that article supports putting the lid down....and so do subsequent statements....

    Research has found that flushing the toilet with the lid down could reduce airborne particles by as much as 50%

    The research found that putting the toilet lid down reduced the number of both visible and smaller droplets during and after flushing by 30-60%

    Lid down causes 30-60% reduction of droplets in the air but they stay in the air longer....

  • This actually is maybe the most legitimate usage of a travel router that I've ever heard.

    If I ever find myself planning to go on a cruise (highly unlikely), I'll be purchasing a travel router.