Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BG
Posts
1
Comments
345
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'm pretty sure you're glossing over Germany replacing nuclear with coal, which has been probably been the largest story in nuclear since Fukushima.

    Even including major disasters, nuclear is one of the safest and cleanest sources of power, and the only one poised to seriously displace fossil fuels in many places.

    If anything, "Sunshine and rainbows" renewables are a psyop to help entrench fossil fuels long-term.

  • I'd be willing to bet most people you'd categorize as "nuclear fanbois" would be perfectly happy if hydroelectric was providing 65% of the grid power.

    The problem is that that renewables are pushed as a "one size fits all" solution that they really aren't.

  • This may not be the slam dunk you think it is. To the best of my understanding, the current coverage under title vii for gender and sexuality has only been extended so far as "would this behaviour be unacceptable for the opposite sex?"

    Florida could argue (within the scope of existing supreme Court decisions) that the use of certain "new" titles are never acceptable, regardless of the person's sex.

    As written, the rule is illegal, but it could possibly be upheld in the context of this specific case.