BestBouclettes @ BestBouclettes @jlai.lu

Posts

40

Comments

982

Joined

2 yr. ago

Well, they usually don't know, don't care, fail to see the potential issues or watch too much TV I guess..

Well most people don't see the problem of having billionaires owning everything all over the place. So if we can have (even more) substantial evidence that they're harmful, it's always good to take.

I want to see chaos at the Olympics but definitely not like that. Strikes and protests definitely, burning infrastructure, fuck no.

People have been wearing and using make-up well before capitalism and make-up companies were even a thought in people's brains. It's just a thing humans do, and that's okay.

Never let a good crisis go to waste

He could have shrugged it off like RBG did and fuck everyone for generations. Better late than never.

Climate change will affect us all and not acting on it is very much a political decision.

I'm pretty certain that if the RN got the majority, even a small one like the NFP did, he wouldn't have been dragging his feet to choose a PM from their side. And we wouldn't have had a "nobody really won the elections" bullshit.

I deeply despise this motherfucker.

"Free speech is when I can say whatever I want and you listen to me and shut up." - Pretty much all free speech absolutists

Migrants and the homeless, also orphans and women in shelters.

It's a fucking joke...

That's a shitty play on words I assume. Socially liberal is typical leftist, economically liberal is usually right wing. So, left of the president on healthcare is good if it's socially speaking, bad if it's in the economic sense.

Aristopopulist is a term I've never heard before and it really englobes that phenomenon of far right bourgeois and aristocrats trying to fish working class votes. That's nice to know.

Not a massive fan of him but at least he took matters into his own hands and is ready to die for his principles, that's respectable. We need more people like him.

What I mean is that these kinds of people usually look at the financial cost per year for a given solution that's already in place and always look for something cheaper (usually only on paper).

Usually they look at the cost of a licence without giving a single thought about, let's say, the processing power that'll be needed for the new thing, the expertise to set it up and run it, and all the migration work that will be needed to make the switch.

Also, when these things happen, most of the time you have to fire/hire/train people to adapt, which means you lose some of your internal knowledge and experience. That's something that can't be really quantified and can really hurt an IT system.

In the end, with all the cumulative costs, it's often far more expensive to switch solutions, and not financially speaking, but that doesn't necessarily appear on the bottom line they will see from their desks.

Poor SUV and driver, the geyser just crossed the road unexpectedly

Figuring out the navigation and flying the ship is definitely part of the experience. As others said, it's much easier with a controller and the autopilot is really nice, but precision flying is a part of the game you'll have to go through at some point (like small platforms landing and flying only with your momentum).

The worst thing in that is the amount of money and human time it must take just to migrate everything. People only looking at the bottom line is the bane of IT...

Germany and ping ponging between proprietary and free software every 2 years, name a better duo

Those are some Fallout (the TV show canon at least) vibes!

You liked COVID? What about an antibiotic resistant bubonic or pulmonary plague, for those 1300's vibes!