Bernie_Sandals @ Bernie_Sandals @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

645

Joined

2 yr. ago

It could also be the earliest chance though, there definitely isn't the activist infrastructure in place to support a general strike yet.

It'll happen, we just need to organize the unions back into fighting strength. The UAW President thinks we could have a general strike by May 1st 2028

Which is the topic we should be discussing, along with WHO is on the take.

Almost all of them? Except Bernie and the Squad, that's what them talking about corporate funding was about. It's also public knowledge who gets paid off by who, just check the campaign contributions.

They don't even care if they're Nazis, So yea.

Do you really think the U.S government are just self declaring Nazis?

Everything you said was covered with 4 layers of hyperbole.

Don't be hyperbolic, it's not 1984 and you still live on a democracy. You won't face any serious criminal repercussions for saying anything in Canada or any other democracy.

He was too angry at Stalin to be afraid.

While they're definitely wrong in ignoring the communist party's value as a signal for disliking the regime/as a protest vote, you're also feeding on propaganda if you think Navalny and his smart voting campaign weren't a very large movement.

If Navalny wasn't a threat to the regime, then Putin wouldn't have hounded him for a decade.

I mean for your own legal protection.

Pre-1948 as in going back to the borders of the one state Mandatory Palestine? Any solution that entails the destruction of the state of Israel is dead in the water for the international community.

What the official is proposing here (two states) would be about the only way to peace.

If _____ happens, I'll do ______ is generally defendable legally, but I would still be careful with stating things like this publicly.

This is exactly what God intended when he gave monarchs divine rights.

Current amount of Genocide with a party in power that at least has some trying to stop it, vs, extra genocide, certainly feels like an either or situation.

Unless you were implying a third party could win.

Would you rather have the Trans genocide Trump is planning? The mass deportations? The military on the street crushing protests?

Are you starting to see a pattern yet, lib? Or do you still want to pretend that western "race science" can simply by swept under the rug by appealing to "everyboy-was-doing-it-ism"?

Why the fuck are you talking about race science still? I haven't brought it up or said something about it once. Why do you think I'm trying to ignore race science or say the West didn't invent it?

19th-century Europe bred a NEW manifestation of antisemitism

Maybe you read your own quote. There'd be no reason to call it a new manifestation if it was the first manifestation ever. Sure you can move the goalpost and say you were only ever arguing about racist science from the 1800s, or you can realize that we've been talking about hatred of Jews, and literally every quote I gave was about that, and that it's existed for thousands of years.

And your source is? Because I've literally seen Hamas released propaganda videos of them shooting up the Kibbutz and festival.

But currently the data is largely hidden and ignored. This is the best their is right now.

Is it though? This sounds rather conspiratorial. A major part of my last job was literally analyzing U.S. Immigration and it's effects on our economy positive and negative. There seemed to be a very very very large amount of research on the topic last I checked.

I'm sure the EU member governments are doing the exact same kind of research on their immigration and will come to the same conclusion. That Immigration can pay off massively, but that the payoff is reliant on integration effort and having jobs open for them.

Overall historically all Immigration in the U.S has paid off, sure our economy might have struggled to accept massive population growth sometimes, but in the end that population growth allowed for far greater and faster economic growth.

So if I used a stereotype about Latino immigrants, it would be a more apt comparison for Europe?

My point still stands that data without any context can be almost as harmful as no data at all.

How so?

Does shooting up a music festival and civilian neighborhoods count as legal violent resistance according to the UN?

PThen you should have no problem proving it, should you?

Yeah it was actually rather easy, just one Google search away to know you're spouting bullshit.

The first clear examples of anti-Jewish sentiment can be traced back to Alexandria in the 3rd century BCE. Alexandrian Jewry were the largest Jewish community in the world and the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, was produced there. Manetho, an Egyptian priest and historian of that time, wrote scathingly of the Jews and his themes are repeated in the works of Chaeremon, Lysimachus, Poseidonius, Apollonius Molon, and in Apion and Tacitus.

Source: The History of Antisemitism, Classical Period (Wikipedia)

Yeah... attempting to excuse the west's invention of white supremacism

I don't think I saw the commenter you're replying to ever try to excuse Western White Supremacism, or say they didn't invent it. I think they were merely pointing out that there's been anti-jewish hatred for far longer than there's been a "West".