Beliriel @ Beliriel @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

83

Joined

2 yr. ago

I mean that's arguably worse, no?

What are the 3 internets?

1. Original open internet mainly for military and university use?
2. AOL eternal September? (internet goes public)
3. Web 2.0 is actually the third iteration because user created content takes off?

That's a variation of a singleton universe timeline.

Lmao get out you paid shill

Oh yeah definitely Life of Brian too, good eye.

There's really only 2 not 5. Most are just variants of the two:

1. Singleton universe: time is linear, causality is set in stone, either through fix points (events that can't be changed). Time travel will just create a loop but causality dictates that this will already have happened and you can't change events.
2. Multiverse: You can go back in time, but doing so will branch the timeline and create a different universe. This will not have impact on any causality as you're an anomaly and you can do whatever you want (kill your grandpa, have a relationship with yourself etc.) and nothing will happen because you are in a parallel dimension and effectively can't produce paradoxes.

Sometimes movies just ignore paradoxes or logical fallacies because it makes for better screen time. But really all time travel is one of the two.

Primer is 1.
MCU is 2. (Endgame pretends to be 1 but really with the series Loki it's clear it's 2)
Predestination is 1.
The series Dark is actually a weird mix of the two. First it's 1. And then morphs into 2.
Triangle is 1.
Rick and Morty is 2.

And you just legitimized a large swath of serial killers. How can you deny someone his kill who is "saving the world"?

Dogma is a really good movie with a Christian theme. Good Omens is a great series with Christian themes though it's more atheist in it's message than Dogma.

Airbnb, uber and doordash are all just attempts at market cornering.

Lemmy was basically God in the metal scene.

That sounds awfully hair splitting to me but sure if the issue can resolved by adding "people" in the front...
It just makes me think in 2-3 years the expression "people of color" is derogatory and we evade to something else like "variety ethnic" or some such. It's dumbing a complicated issue that should be talked about down to senseless nitpicking and in-groups, which just makes the problems worse for edge case racist population groups, which should be educated and not humiliated. And being arrogant and saying "but they can educate themselves" is just as much part of the problem than the ones closing their eyes and ears and refusing to learn. But seriously we had like 5 different expressions within the past 10 years and keeping up with whatever the newest fad expression is is slowly becoming cumbersome. To me it's just like I stopped caring about the + in LGBT+. It too much hassle and really not worth it for me. If someone really cares about it then I'm open for a discussion but frankly there's enough else going on in my life than having to spend time on the problems of 0.1% of the population. Hell. some medical conditions have a higher incidence rate.

Who?

That's a them problem now. If they think they have it better in China ... lol ... let them leave. They can eat bitterness and see how it tastes.
Also if they start to think critically they will take themselves out. And the spying fiascos China produced over the years doesn't help.

Denying the holocaust is only possible because of freedom of speech and look what it's doing.

This only works for that particular law (insults) and I agree. However it breaks down at misinformation and allowing more of it enables attacks on the very foundation of those freedoms. And very often insults and misinformation go hand in hand in people with extremist stances.

Being forced into it due to family will feel bad. But if nothing else is going on, people might actually enjoy it. I have seen churches in the jungle and the mass on weekends was like a social happening like a party people were looking forward to.

And why are those being built? Because the consumer population doesn't care and continues consuming the cheapest dirtiest shit imaginable.

With rent prices in this kind of fantasy land in bigger metroploes like San Fran or NYC , I'd doubt you'd find tenants. Maybe in rural laboratories it might be an issue but not the cities. That's just my thoughts. Might be wrong.

Yeah well it's called web 2.0 so naturally we need a dot.com bubble 2.0, only it's just the data bubble and failure to monetize it or rather you can't just monetize social media data. Turns out that data is still not much use to advertisers no matter how manipulative and optimized their method is. Data is still data and not money. The only institutions really actually getting use out of that would be governments (look at China). VC are pulling out and advertisers are pulling out.