BeautifulMind ♾️ @ BeautifulMind @lemmy.world

Late-diagnosed autistic, special interest-haver, dad, cyclist, software pro

---

Read more

Posts

24

Comments

449

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yeah these are the same folks arguing that if the authors of sec 3 of the 14th amendment wanted to specifically prevent a former president that engaged in insurrection they would have, so we can conclude they didn't want that. So, if they had every opportunity to write religion into the constitution and didn't do it, what now?

Then when you notice that they specifically wrote in the first amendment the establishment clause- and then you realize that Jefferson explained its purpose to be creating a wall of separation between church and state, what now again?

Oh, no!

Well anyways

I'm gonna go with: don't send cops on welfare checks. Send somebody competent to respond to mental health challenges, preferably someone not wearing a police uniform (after all, at this point a lot of folks think "unaccountable killer" when they see that uniform and there's honestly reason for that).

I met my wife while I was shrooming That was 23 years ago We're still together

LOL McDonald's hasn't seen my shadow in 10 years at least

This is the stupidest timeline

Welp. It's time for Tesla workers to unionize, and hard

Gruesome.

I'm not convinced the death penalty is worthwhile except to feed someone's wrath.

What if, (and hear me out,) we did for corrections the sort of thing that countries with low recidivism do? Like, not use for-profit prisons with incentive to turn out re-offenders, and not use prisons that turn out hardened criminals that aren't equipped to function in the world without resorting to crime, and actually take the 'corrections' or 'rehabilitation' parts of their nomenclature seriously?

If all we do with our prisons is punish and humiliate (and squeeze slave labor out of) convicts, we're just creating future crime and all that's left at that point is killing convicts at industrial pace unless you can figure out that crime is more driven by poverty than anything else, and the USA just doesn't want to figure that out because it just doesn't want to solve poverty or crime, it wants to make money creating and punishing both.

mmmm, smells like freedom

When churchmen confess their churches are organized crime syndicates

The torches, pitchforks, guillotine, tar, and feathers aren’t going to reach a billionaire. They’re going to be used on whoever is around.

The point, of course, is that the cost of being a billionaire is that you can't go out in public- if the public is mad enough about it

The catch is that if they pay taxes and life gets better for other people we agree to not bring out the torches, pitchforks, and guillotines or tar, feathers, and such

When doing the right thing, or even doing right by your conscience, is a crime... you live in a place and time in which politicians haven't been tarred or feathered and run out of town on a rail in too long

Yep this is the logical consequence of turning your state into un-free shitholes ruled by petty authoritarians

Is there a possible way that both the NYT and OpenAI could lose?

He's mad that there's a move afoot to sell seized Russian assets and use the proceeds to fund Ukraine's defense. The signal is: if you buy these things (yachts, real estate, whatever) Russia will see to it as a matter of official policy that you will fall carelessly out of a high window somewhere. The quiet part said out loud, tho, is that Russia now claims that anything it ever held, whether as the USSR or imperial Russia, or the current Russian Federation, is theirs forever no takebacks.

Basically the read on this should be: Russia is having trouble laundering rubles into non-sanctioned currencies (those foreign assets are basically conduits to do that) and is now saying essentially that if they can't keep our offshore loot they'll just seize all of Eastern Europe and demand tribute from their vassal territories

...of course, if Russia could actually do any of that it already would have

He's already a felon, FFS. The only reason he's out walking around is Trump pardoned him

I'd take it today. I'm in my 50s, I'm an endurance athlete (I race bikes) and the calculus looks like: if I wait 20 years I get to experience body-age 50-70 twice, but if I take it now I experience 30-50 twice. Living my prime twice is better than enduring my decline twice, thanks

Ok, that's fair. The point I wanted to make upthread was that these sorts of impossible things are regularly made to work when making it work is worthwhile. Most of the 'but this is a limitation of the technology' talk here (about how EVs can't work in the cold, etc) is defeatist bullshit that ignores that really if you want it to work it can be made to work

The main thing is that electric is the same way,

No, the larger point is that it's a struggle to make diesel work at +20F if you don't do the things to make it work, and yet these things can be made to work reliably at -50F. The obstacle isn't the limitations of the technology, it's whether or not the cost curve makes sense. Electric can be made to work cheaply, if it's important to you that it work- just like it's possible to make that diesel turn over at -50F