Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BA
Posts
0
Comments
103
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • At no point does OP ndicate that isn't what Karl said in the video. They state that the video is unnecessarily inflammatory when "yo, the tax returns for this charity golf tournament don't look right either. I'm not saying people are pocketing the cash, but it doesn't look like donations are being accurately reported. Since I'm not a citizen, you should report these guys here."

  • There's no conversation here. You accused someone of something that is entirely irrelevant to the original post. OP didnt say that Karl was wrong, or that he didn't say "go to the authorities." They said that Karl is reporting on something in a biased way that likely is inaccurate in some of its details which is irresponsible. Your reading comprehension failure is why I'm mocking you with the quote method. Figured the changing capitalization might gather your attention long enough to get you caught up, but I guess not.

  • I'm hardly suggesting he can't. I've imposed no moral assertion here, but you have by suggesting that the OP didn't watch the video and is commenting on it none the less.

    Karl, being in Australia is not realistically bound by US libel laws. Sure Billy is using, but that's gone nowhere, and it's a motherfucker to sue someone in a foreign country, so realistically he doesn't need lawyers for this. Regardless, in the US a discrepancy or even a series of discrepancies on a tax return is not proof that a charity isn't doing charitable things. Innocent until proven guilty; ergo Karl is speculating.

    All that is actually being said is that op can have watched the video, sawn that Karl was in fact being biased, stated as much at which point you came in and said "yOu ShouLda wAtCheD THe viDeo. 🤪"

  • I watched the whole video, and while yes Karl does conclude with that, many of the statements of fact he makes aren't actually fact but speculation. This is super biased reporting. Doesn't mean he's wrong, just that he's biased.

  • What happened to Leprous? I only started doing metal a few years ago and Leprous caughty attention, but the newer stuff kinda shook me. Just wasn't able to make that jump, but if there were context, maybe I could bridge it.

  • Difference between whiskey history and honey history is human input. Honey sorta happens without people. Whiskey does not. Millenia old honey, while neat, is still just honey. century old whiskey however contains all the choices the distiller made. It's almost certainly not made to a strict recipe, and it likely used ingredients we wouldn't today. Theres a lot to experience that has changed in distilling since it was distilled. Less so with honey.

    Not knocking honey btw. Best honey I've ever had came from a backyard in Austin. I do recognize honey isn't created equally. Just that time doesn't really change what the bees have available so much.

  • I am not a fan of Hamas, I just have to ask, wtf are the Palestinians supposed to do, and if you aren't expecting an animal you've backed into a corner to attack, wtf is wrong with you?

    Those statistics are a preamble of why Hamas did this. I'm not at any point saying that it's a good thing, I'm saying that violence is literally the only tool Palestine has.