BURN @ BURN @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

1,317

Joined

2 yr. ago

AI does not “read books” and it’s completely disingenuous to compare them to humans that way.

It is stealing data. In order to train on it they have to store the data. That’s a copyright violation. There’s no way to interpret it as not stealing data.

No

Why are you entitled to use everyone else’s work? It should be secured in law that licensing applies to training data to avoid frivolous discussions like this. Then it’s an entirely opt-in solution, which works in the benefit of everyone except the people stealing data.

Output doesn’t matter since it’s pretty well settled it’s not derivative work (as much as I disagree with that statement).

You don’t need to prove a financial difference. They are fundamentally different systems that function in different ways. They cannot be compared 1:1 and laws cannot be applied as a 1:1. New regulations need to be added around AI use of copyrighted material.

Yes you would need permission. Just because you’re a hobbyist doesn’t mean you’re exempt from needing to follow the rules.

As soon as it goes beyond a completely offline, personal, non-replicatible project, it should be subject to the same copyright laws.

If you purely create a data agnostic AI model and share the code, there’s no problem, as you’re not profiting off of the training data. If you create an AI model that’s available for others to use, then you’d need to have the licensing rights to all of the training data.

Training is theft imo. You have to scrape and store the training data, which amounts to copyright violation based on replication. It’s an incredibly simple concept. The model isn’t the problem here, the training data is.

Also an “AI” is not human, and should not be regulated as such

And why is that a bad thing?

Why are you entitled to other peoples work, just because “it’s hard to find data”?

You can make these models just fine using licensed data. So can any hobbyist.

You just can’t steal other people’s creations to make your models.

Too bad

Why do they have free reign to store and use copyrighted material as training data? AIs don’t learn as a human would, and comparisons can’t be made between the learning processes.

Airplanes are crazy over engineered. Something like half the systems can fail and they’ll still be able to land the plane.

The safety regulations are written in blood, but they’ve continually prevented more disasters.

I’m sure the MAX 9 is going to have a lot of investigation done very soon.

I see how far it’s come and I fucking hate it. It creates nothing, it wholly brings down the quality of art in the world and destroys countless people’s lives. There are no benefits

The un-fucking of Windows 8 release

It actually was a pretty useable OS most of the time

800+ hours in this game

Im still deciding if I want to do another playthrough before 2.0 though. Maybe I’ll actually play SE through past the first rocket launches and that should give at least another 800 hours.

There is absolutely a need for data. This is why everyone says the pro-gun sides have no arguments. There’s no concrete data you can point to just “much logic”, which means nothing in conversations where facts need to be brought up.

An AI does not learn like a human does. Therefore the same laws and principles can’t be applied to computer “learning” as can be to human learning.

They’re fundamentally different uses of the material.

30% is industry standard from Apple, Microsoft, Google, Sony, etc.

Steam taking 30% is nothing out of the norm

Im not against screens entirely, just ones that are touchscreen and hide critical buttons behind menus.

A screen that does nothing more than GPS, Music and Backup cameras is pretty much the extent of what I’d need, and there’s a bunch of 3rd party accessories that do that.

Touchscreens are the lower quality product here

Physical buttons do everything better and are safer for drivers since they require less attention to be taken off the road.

I will continue to refuse to buy any car that has internet connectivity or touchscreens. They’re unsafe and unnecessary, only allowing for more tracking of our personal lives

Also half the quality of service. I only order delivery from places with dedicated delivery staff because without fail, food delivered by a gig worker is cold, incorrect, missing, late or otherwise fucked up.

The trend has been that delivery is getting worse, not better