Skip Navigation

Awoo [she/her]
Awoo [she/her] @ Awoo @hexbear.net
Posts
1
Comments
405
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • Lmao this response is up there with "the black sun isn't nazi it's an ancient symbol" and "azov's wolfsangel is actually an N and an I which stands for 'Idea of the Nation'".

    You're a fascist mate and should stop fucking pretending otherwise. You're the worst crypto-fascist I've ever seen.

  • I thought renewables were cheaper than coal. How is this possible?

    Renewables are cheaper than coal.

    What you've misunderstood about capitalism is it's not the thing that is cheapest that gets investment. The investment goes to the thing that gives you the highest ROI, return on investment.

    If it produces a better ROI per square meter, it gets the investment.

    The problem is capitalism.

  • Good job their industry doesn't kill 217 per year guaranteeing its pathway to extinction then!

    Come on, it was fucking obvious the prior user was doing hyperbole why did you feel the need to do a smarmy correction? Extremely reddit behaviour.

  • On the plus side everyone will shut the fuck up about claims that Chinese research ships are all disguised whaling vessels.

  • Most communists have a general understanding that the way Iran is today is in fact America's fault

    I'm not sure what I said differently here, I was referring to the historical events of US backed revolution and bombings that led to the existing Iran when I wrote the above. Modern Iran exists because America wanted to stop us socialists from getting power there. Everyone on this website should remind themselves of this when they see anticommunists screaming about "tankies". Anticommunism leads to backing the far right consistently throughout history.

  • In various circumstances critical support of problematic governments is support of the people when harm to their state by outside actors will bring harm to those people. Most communists have a general understanding that the way Iran is today is in fact America's fault and that the change it needs won't come from outside of it, particularly when the people using various problems as a political weapon do not have the improvement of the lives of the people as their goal but instead various other geopolitical and resource interests.

    The most recent historical example of this would be Syria, with Libya a close second and Iraq a close third. All of which are objectively worse off thanks to western interventionism.

    You can and should oppose interventionism and outside actors fucking with the situation there if you do care about the people, while also not defending the theocracy and support real local political movements for change (ie the ones not funded by NED or various other cia or nato affiliated intermediaries).

  • Not really. We've had forums that literally allow you to post to them without even signing up with an account. Without being a "user" at all. This isn't about "checking" anyone, it's simply about limiting its ability to be used as a troll tool below the point at which it becomes too tedious to bother. At that point you have eliminated 99% of it.

    This CSAM poster is 1 single person among hundreds of thousands. Making it too tedious to perform eliminates them along with the problem entirely.

  • Forums have existed on the internet forever and and have already dealt with this thousands of times previously. You don't need to overthink it or reinvent the wheel. It didn't stop forums existing very comfortably in the past and isn't an issue that should be that different to deal with today.

    Simply limit image uploads to a certain account age threshold and karma threshold and you will eliminate 99% of the ability to abuse this.

  • You are not a moron, stop pretending to be. You know how to use the internet. You don't "win" by saying "please provide a link". It's there on the worldbank site, look it the fuck up and stop resorting to debatebro redditisms. If you spoke like this to someone in person they would punch you in the face.

  • That's literally not what you just linked to lol. It's what I linked to sure. But you know how to type in a basic URL instead of a subdomain that's only used for certain links.

    The url error on my part is irrelevant. You're pretending to be internet illiterate for the sake of defending a position you already know can't be defended. This is what you people always do, rather than accept that any real analysis of human conditions under socialism vs capitalism does not support capitalism you deflect.

  • Your data is either not found

    Bro it's the world bank. If you can't access it that's a problem on your fucking side not the most reliable data source used in academia for nations on the fucking planet.

    Holy fucking shit is this your first time even hearing about them? Do they teach anything in your schools at all?

  • Using wikipedia is dogshit, stop using it.

    The World Bank data is here, which is the same data used in the study: https://datatopics.worldbank.org

    The actual current data is:

    USA: 77.28

    Cuba: 77.57

    Vietnam: 75.38

    China: 78.08

    Look at Hong Kong kicking ass at #1 though.

    Hong Kong is not a country, it is a city in China. Individual cities are not good examples of life expectancy when life expectancy of cities typically outperforms life expectancy of rural regions due to quicker access to life-saving medical facilities afforded by density. This is why you really shouldn't rely on Wikipedia for your understanding of anything. You should go to primary sources yourself instead of allowing editors to curate and present information for you.

    I think your info might be a bit out of date at this point.

    Irony?

  • It depends entirely upon how it is obtained.

    Generally you are correct that a certain level of worth is unobtainable without being a horrible human but not always. As I said, there are many athletes who are working class despite earning many tens of millions.

    I very much consider Muhammed Ali a revolutionary comrade for example.

    Then there is Maradona. An incredible comrade who has Fidel Castro's face tattoo'd to his leg and Che's on his arm. Who did incredibly important work for socialism in latin america.

    You should focus less on their total income and more on how it is made. Class is what matters, and while class generally forms along the lines of rich vs poor this is a reductive simplification of marxist thought.

  • Which ones? There are plenty of rich working class people that I consider comrades. The issue we socialists have isn't income, the issue is class, which is quite different.

    Your class is determined not by your income but by how you receive your income. A working class person makes their income by selling their labour to a member of the bourgeoisie (capital-owner), whereas a member of the bourgeoisie makes their income by stealing the surplus labour from a member of the working class.

    There are working class people that can make quite a bit of money. Athletes and actors for example. Although in many cases once people make that kind of money they also become members of the bourgeoisie by investing it in passive income such as landlording or stocks, that is not true of all of them and is very much something that should not be assumed.

    As for killing the bourgeoisie, I am in favour of simply phasing them out. Although I am not naive enough to think that they will just allow that to happen without trying to kill every last one of us first to prevent it, and believe in the need for us to be prepared for violent action when they do turn to that option. It is not an act that I think should be advocated for by itself, other than with some hefty layers of irony as a means of generally promoting militancy.

  • Say something that isn't vague and useless then.

  • I am 100% certain that if you compared socialist countries today you would get the same result.

    This is extremely obvious when you consider that despite obviously lower levels of development in countries like China, Cuba and Vietnam have higher life expectancy than America.

    Not to mention that 21% of america is illiterate whereas literacy in socialist countries is consistently the highest in the world.

    Any person doing even the most limited of critical thought about healthcare access, education and life expectancy can understand that socialist countries today would come out on top when compared to their capitalist counterparts that sit at the same level of development.

    The fact that you just dismiss it with the USSR present in the data is odd. You are aware that rent in the USSR was 5% of your total income correct? I think your perspective and understanding of how people lived is not in line with reality, your confusion about this data is because you have fully bought into propaganda instead of getting a proper and measured idea about things. You are not immune to propaganda.

  • List within the study and the classifications:

    If this image doesn't display for you(because of the attacks) let me know and I'll find some other way to share it.

    Here's an image of how the comparison shakes up:

  • "I'm scared of having my political illiteracy exposed and dunked on so I only ever write intentionally vague responses."