Skip Navigation

Posts
3
Comments
374
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • That's how it was. Then the "infinite growth" mind virus infected all of the private sector. I think it's because with the internet and global markets, the competition between firms isn't about fighting for customers - the customer base is essentially infinite, or at least much bigger than the firms need, so the goal isn't to serve your customers better so they come to you instead of your competitors. What's scarce is investment capital - more and more of the equity markets are consolidated into fewer and fewer players, and since the modern share market is much more speculative (i.e. investors buy not on the expected value of the share of the profits they get as dividends, but on the ability to flip their shares to someone else at a higher price later, who in turn is only buying because they anticipate flipping the shares, there's no regard to the fundamentals of the business), the goal is to compete with other firms by showing the capital investors that you can offer the best return on investment.

    Under this mindset, you don't have customers to serve, you have assets to monetise, you've gotta show the moneymen that you're getting faster and faster growth with lots of new revenue streams - you don't actually need for these to pan out, because noone cares about whether you're actually making profits so much as whether you look like you're growing so you can be flipped to another speculator. And in that mindset, customers are an obstacle - they're preventing you from monetising your assets by standing between you and their money.

  • I look at it like this:Two sides. One side is completely full of shit and they know it. They also know the other side knows. However, both sides have agreed to keep up the pretense of everything being okay, for whatever reason. I like to call it the "Slow Break-up".

    It's like when your romantic partner stops showing up for date nights, then they get home late, then they start sleeping on the couch. And eventually you get around to asking, "Is something wrong?" And they're all like, "No, everything is fine, work's just been riding me so hard lately, and now I get home so late that I don't want to wake you up." Then one day they're packing their shit to leave, and they look at you and go, "Look, we both saw this coming."

    It's always "not happening" until it's already happened. The moment is skipped over where they could acknowledge they misled you, try to make amends, maybe do something about the problem.

    But, my overall point is this. A civil war would be like a fight between spouses. Like, a big serious fight. Where there is the possibility that someone's going to yell "I want a divorce!". So the divorce happens, but both parties move on, and try to heal. I am on the side that wants to have the fight, move on, and heal.

  • In the case of the school helping students socially transition without telling the parents, being a parent myself, I can understand how upset those parents might be, but the public school was probably told not to tell the parents for fear that the parents might not take it well. That's a lot of parents. If my son came to me and said he did not feel right as a boy, I would respect his feelings, and support and help and empathize. Not many others would. At the school district in question, there would be so many kids pulled out of school and sent to Christian indoctrination centers to be forced to see themselves how their parents what them to see themselves.

  • The media made them paranoid. No one is actually coming for them.

    Truth. They also let people on sites like "Truth" and social media grifters tell them shit like "Public schools are turning your kids trans!" and they eat it up.

  • And the last thing we should do is bunch ourselves up in one spot, or even in one State. That's just doing their work for them. all they'd have to do if we moved to one State or one general area is to build walls around it. They'd follow Israel's example and keep us all in one spot, genociding us through attrition. Cut us off from food and utilities, blockade our ports so supplies from other countries can't get in, cut us off from communications so we can't tell nobody what's going on, and watch from the top of their walls as we die.

  • And they do it because they think it makes them immortal. They fear death. That dark abyss. Their deeds laid bare, their sins punished.

  • I find it hard to believe there's no evidence, I mean, the Romans ruled half the world and were meticulous and methodical in their record keeping. I find it difficult to imagine they have no historical records of Iesus Nazaretum.

  • For a minute there I thought Elesh Norn was nearby and I was about to be compleated.

  • Exactly. They would probably force implant embryos into women, and then arrest them for murder if the embryo fails to take hold.

  • And watch as being a shareholder confers no tangible benefits for owning stock in the website of which you are a user, or worse, you get benefits, but they are limited to how much stock you have.

  • I'll need to do proper research, but to my understanding the embryo is an egg(ovum). I'm not sure at what point an ovum becomes an embryo, but I'm fairly certain it's shortly after a sperm cell penetrates the outer layer and begins the mitosis.

  • It's because they haven't winnowed the State as Marx described. The problem is that once certain members of the Proletariat get their hands upon the levers of power, they find they rather like it and don't want to let go.

  • I wish violence didn't solve everything, the world would be a much easier place to live in. But brutes only speak the language of violence.

  • Or, when it's done as a class activity, the workers admit the deed, loud and proud, as a message to all the other billionaires.

  • Exactly. Capitalism spits in the face of the concept of a social contract, especially if companies themselves didn't write it.

  • And the Judge was furious they couldn't give him a harsher sentence. That five years was quite literally throwing the book at him. It's a felony, though, so even after he gets out he'll be stripped of his rights to vote or purchase a firearm. His job prospects will dwindle to the point of non-existence. And I think he'll be prevented from owning a computer or accessing the Net, given the nature of his crime.

  • That's nice of him to say. What's he going to do about it? So sick of all these spineless, yellow-bellied wimps saying how bad Trump is, and doing precisely fuck all. GROW A FUCKING BACKBONE, ALREADY, YOU COWARDS!

  • Yes, but even if the base model hardware is incapable of doing something, someone savvy enough could modify it. It's the same logic they use to ban AR-15s in some states in the US. By default, all civilian ARs are built to fire in semi-auto only, BUT, a knowledgeable individual can make it fire in full auto if they drill a hole in the lower receiver in just the right spot.

    Edit: Okay, I'm getting roasted for pointing out that no system is 100% secure against malicious actors? Perhaps you're missing my point that I disagree with banning Flipper Zero and fully believe it's Canadian politicians looking like they're doing something, regardless of whether or not it will actually work.