You see it as dismissive. Low effort reply, like they couldn't be bothered. It's not inviting continued conversation so you see it as someone telling you to stop talking to them.
If I were to guess. In your eyes. They might as well have replied with "cool story bro".
Which is now forever a sarcastic term and no one regardless of what you say, will believe that you actually found their story cool.
I don't know what parts you are talking about since you're not specific.
Furthermore. Kanban is just a method of keeping track of who does what and what the progress of that is. You can use kanban in waterfall. You can use kanban in scrum. No one is just using kanban and nothing else. As your post seems to think.
Specifically, you would have to put in effort to be more wrong.
Go read the scrum manifest.
In reality, companies always adapt for what they think suits them. Very rarely do you actually use scrum completely as intended, that's fine. But you don't blame the cow when the cook burned your steak. You blame the cook.
You report it stolen to the police. You report it stolen to your home insurance (if you have one). Then you get a new phone and move on with your life.
People talk about theft protection settings. They're good to have. But they're most likely not gonna get you your phone back.
Your description of events doesn't match reality. You just make up whatever sounds good and then tell people they're the ones who need to prove you wrong.
Just like you made up that Zelenaky had canceled elections. I had to quote and link you the actual law, thrice, because you couldn't comprehend what was written.
So much for your "knowledge"
Cute little mimic game you got going. Truly playing the part of a child.
The people have the power to elect governments. And the people have the power to oust governments. That is Democracy at display.
You've categorically been willfully ignorant and proven wrong throughout this entire discussion. Your meager attempts at insulting me over and over won't change anything, and only exposes you for the manchild you are.
I don't quite follow the last part. "She will have to choose and change one of them at her expense"
Obviously you need to update your license if you change your name.
So she can update her BC to match her new name? Or is that impossible, thus making her unable to vote because of it.