Atomic @ Atomic @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

583

Joined

2 yr. ago

"Clear intent from the phrasing"

How is "no more gain weight" clear with intent

Yes I read it the first time. It's such a wild undefineable description that differs from person to person, even from environment to environment.

But you interpret the magical pill how you want. And I'll interpret it how I see fit. Deal?

Excess weight is literally fat. That is how the body stores excess energy.

Not sure if you can live without any fat or not. Would have to look into it.

I see it from a biological perspective. Weight gain is derived from absorption of nutrients. You gain and lose weight all the time. As soon as your intestines no longer hold food you are no longer absorbing nutrients and therefore are losing weight from just existing.

I cannot argue with your interpretation of a made up magical pill. I just see it from another perspective.

Perhaps you would enjoy the no fat pill more since that's how the body store excess energy.

You are now a proud citizen of Zimbabwe, you own trillions of useless bills.

#2 is straight up torture. No matter how much you eat, you cannot stop losing weight. Your body no longer retains nutrients as it passes right through you

It's 15 AUD, not 25.

As for myself. I play maybe on average 2-3 missions per day.

So 70 ish missions per month. Collect an average of 10sc per mission. That's 700sc + the 300 you get from the previous warbond.

That sounds very reasonable to me for an average playtime of 1h per day.

Cool. You can believe whatever you want. I'm still going to give the mod team the benefit of the doubt until I hear anything from Valve for the reasons I've already mentioned.

They "gave them 8 years"? What do you mean by that exactly?

There was a time limit they were working under that I'm not aware of?

I never said their side is 100% true. I'm sure there are some nuances. But as said. Valve is notorious for not communicating so being blindsided by them doesn't sound strange.

And mate. Just because someone believes something doesn't mean there has to be some truth to it. Some people believe the eart is flat. You think there's any truth to that?

Someone "hacking" files or systems doesn't always mean what you think it does. Naughty Dog "hacked" PS1 to create crash bandicoot. Just means they gained knowledge in how the hardware works. Not that their game only works on "hacked" hardware.

So until I hear anything from valve. I'm inclined to believe the mod team. Based on valves previous interactions with their community.

For all I can tell, that's "just a guy" on reddit saying something. That's not a reliable source.

His claims are also in direct contradiction to what the mod team claims. I don't know why anyone would instinctively trust his claims over the mod teams. He claims Valve reached out to them and said "Don't use this exploit", Where as the mod team says "No one from Valve has made any requests regarding the mod at all".

As far as I know, Valve is notorious for just not communicating and do whatever they want to do. Too big to care I guess. They're a money printing company.

I don't think the author have any idea at all about what astronomers actually do...

Darmok and Jalad, on the ocean.

It is a point for them to coexist. It's called plausible deniability.

What exactly are you trying to argue? That it's not a good reason for a country to get a bunch of uranium without raising questions?

There was absolutely no incentive to research more about alternative fuels, uranium and plutonium were materials the nuclear powers wanted. For more than just 1 reason...

If countries REALLY wanted nuclear power without Uranium. They would have researched it. Like China have. But no one else has. Well some have, but they all gave up a long time ago.

Sweden was researching it, but decided to go with Uranium, coincidentally, they just happened to also research nuclear weapons... very strange coincidence that... (Sweden was later encouraged to halt all nuclear weapons research)

Yes. They compete for the same raw material. That's the whole point. Gives you a perfectly good reason to excavate it.

It gives you a reason to access the materials you need for nuclear weapons.

Who is saying they're using the fuel for reactors to make the weapons? Just you.

And not that I count it. But they do infact make weapons from spent uranium. They make artillery shells from it. Buy like I said. I don't even count that.

US experiments were broken off because it gives no excuse to attain materials for nuclear weapons. Same excuse everyone else use.

Arachnids are not insects though.

Insects don't have lungs. It also means their potential size is directly limited by the oxygen content in the air.

Which is why we don't see cat sized insects roaming around.

I know how Australia does things. You still need to prove your identity when you enrol to vote. If you don't have any of the proof they require, you can have a mate that is enrolled vouch that you are you along with your name and address.

The difference is that Australia is capable of keeping track of their citizens and are willing to verify your eligibility for you.

Fair point. Something I did not consider.

Though as far as I can recall, Democrats have done little to actually make voting more accessible. From what I can see, neither party seems interested. A simple step such as holding elections on a weekend or non-working day where the majority is free would go a long way. Not to play whatabout here. The idea of having to prove you're a citizen to vote is reasonable. Your fear is they will make that proof unreasonably difficult to attain is understandable.