Asetru @ Asetru @feddit.org

Posts

1

Comments

265

Joined

1 yr. ago

If it's drawn art, yeah, same.

Yeah. He borrowed money for a house at 1.5%. Then inflation hit almost 10 during covid and our salary didn't fully cover this but was raised way more than 1.5%. Money lost value much faster than his debt increased, so the banks effectively lose money on him while his paycheck grows faster than his debt increases.

Or in more generic terms, inflation is good if you borrow money.

If your interest is less than inflation.

Like my colleague who bought a house for about 1.5% before inflation nearly went to 10. Man.

BiteAway gang!

If you can bear the cringe of the interviewer, there's a good interview with Penrose that goes on the same direction: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e9484gNpFF8

Not playing the anniversary edition?

No worries, just wanted to check if I'm missing something.

Not saying it isn't, but if somebody tells me it should be less than half of what I'm seeing it for I might as well ask if I'm missing something, no?

7 bucks? Saw that and immediately opened steam.

Am I missing something? That's the only bundle I found for animal well...

It's not a single bit worse than before the announcement.

There were huge enterprise sets. They were terrific. No need to pay ten times as much for the inferior Lego quality...

The bluebrixx models, especially the later waves, were perfect. My son recently built the USS Stargazer and it's terrific. I can't imagine Lego delivering the same quality considering what they shipped over the last few years. It's a shame. Would have loved to get my hands on some more bb sets.

Read that as "2 ISO rounds per minute" and that made it even better.

No no no, you don't get it! Humans only have eyes, so cars that only have eyes should perform just as good as humans! Disregard that humans don't perform well in fog or rain or generally anything that isn't good weather and also disregard that to match our eyes' resolution you'd need extremely high resolution cameras that produce way too much data for current computers and also disregard that most of the stuff isn't happening in our eyes but in our brains and also disregard that the point that is usually being made to advocate for self driving cars is that they should be better than humans!

Black and white are pretty overrepresented there though. Turning this into a sphere might help?

unless I am kissing something from the animated series

Well, are you?

Yeah, same here.

No one need 10.000 books

Not with that attitude.

Anyone else getting a 404?

How can you be so dense?

Using a calculator for math is cheating unless it has been explicitly allowed. Which it isn't until higher grades because before that, people are supposed to do math without a calculator. Which they should do to get a proper understanding about the subject.

The same holds for literally any tool. If the goal is to get the students to be able to convincingly communicate their thoughts or to see if they understood a topic by making them explain it, having them use chatgpt accomplished nothing and just wastes everybody's time. If the goal is to see if they can produce enough bullshit to satisfy an average public administration, then letting them use llms might be valid. Just like any other tool, it's legitimate to allow llms or not, based on whatever is supposed to end up in a student's head. But using it without it being allowed is cheating, simple as that.