Is there a source without links to the regime in the UK? The UK is considered a 'systemic rival' to the EU by the EU, so any claims by UK state-affiliated media should be viewed through a lens of foreign propaganda.
Hungary’s interior ministry claimed the deal would improve safety in tourist hotspots or during events that attract large numbers of spectators
Okay so reading between the lines, it's about tourist services and has no impact on 99.9% of the country?
But the plan has drawn criticism from those concerned the agreement will be abused by communist China,
Who are these people?
which has a lengthy record of human rights abuses.
Which abuses?
The patrols could be the first step to establishing secret police stations or used to intimidate the overseas Chinese community, they warned.
Based on what? Who warned? Who are they?
Daniel Freund: Orban is showing his true colours: deep red. There’s nothing to learn from a communist dictatorship except for tyranny and totalitarian control of citizens.
Viktor Orban is a communist actually, says their expert. For more insight into the overwhelming intellect of their expert, I present to you his pinned tweet. https://nitter.poast.org/daniel_freund/status/1766097991180382216#m
Note this expert is not the 'they' from earlier.
There are also deep-seated EU anxieties about Beijing’s use of surveillance and its human rights record with the Uighurs.
From who? Your readers certainly, but anyone who follows world affairs knows that their 'human rights record with the Uighurs' is completely clean. Since they can't publish that conspiracy theory any more, now they just hope you infer it.
They're shooting to kill. If they hit someone, that person has been gunned down whether they die immediately or after bleeding out. They're shooting at a crowd of thousands, and 800 are dead or dying as a result, according to Al Jazeera. So maybe we need to wait a few more hours before the 1000+ number can be confirmed, but it's already obvious Israel was aiming for 'thousands'.
The main criticism 'established' western-aligned media uses to attack The Grayzone is that they have maintained and shown evidence for ISIL using chemical weapons against Syrians, whereas the western narrative is that it was the Syrian government.
You've received several answers now, so I don't know if you want more.
do you all have any views/positions/ideals that align with the right or far right?
Yes, definitely. A nationalist might be strongly opposed to imperialism because they want their country to be self-reliant. A libertarian might be strongly opposed to nationalism.
Libertarians actually kinda move left as they get more principled in their beliefs so it's a bit of a cheat. But my point is that as long as people generally strive for what they believe is best for the most people, then they'll identify a lot of the same issues and potentially come up with similar solutions.
Not to be too disparaging of the right, it's easy to sit on my high horse and claim I have everything figured out, but I think the major discriminator for Marxists Leninists is that we're pretty strict about requiring everyone read theory and come to any discussions with the same knowledge and word-definitions. It does mean there's a big grind to overcome to even be listened to, but ultimately I think it helps us better identify problems and evaluate solutions than those on the right. The theory isn't a bible by the way, it's just the best analysis of our predecessors. As the world evolves, and as people are able to disprove old ideas, new ideas need to take their place.
I don't believe in horseshoe theory, but I believe everyone is good at heart and smart. They just don't have the right environment and education to foster those values under capitalism.
My Vietnamese friend says they like Chinese people and China. I think maybe it's just how if you come to Norway, everyone will form a line to tell you Denmark is the devil, but they actually like Denmark more than they like almost anyone else.
Kan du laste opp den artikkelen til archive.org? Gratisversjonen av artikkelen henger hovedsaklig på denne:
i sosiale medier spekuleres det i om Hersh’ kilde snarere kan befinne seg i Russland og jobbe på vegne av Kreml.
Altså at NAFO sier det er Russisk propaganda. Men de sier alt er Russisk propaganda. Å sette en anonym kilde fremstilt av Hersh og Reddit kommentarer på samme linje er helt useriøst.
De nevner også Tweeten om at "poor waif in his underwear" er et Russisk ordspill som ekstra bevis, men så vidt jeg kan finne så stemmer ikke det. Det er ikke engang relevant, siden det ikke er samme kilde det er snakk om.
Blir også teit å si at en hypotetisk Russisk kilde hadde hatt interessekonflikt, og deretter vise til en Norsk kilde. Snakker da om Faktisk.no.
Faktisk.no kan jeg ikke debunke eller bli overbevist av. Det krever for mye teknisk kunnskap, ressurser og data vanlig folk ikke har tilgang til, og det vet de. Dette føles som 'gish gallop', fordi når jeg ser på de delene hvor jeg faktisk kan forstå nok til å ha en mening, så er det tydelig lav kvalitet på argumentene.
En del av artikkelen handler om at Stoltenberg er for ung til å ha hatt noen mening om Vietnamkrigen. Det blir for dårlig. Den kan godt hende at han tok feil, han blandet Stoltenberg med noen andre. Samme det vel? Det er en så liten detalj. Dessuten så er det faktisk.no som tar feil. Stoltenberg begynte i AFU i 1972. Og han sier han angrer på at søstra dro han med på en anti-Vietnamkrig protest. Anti-anit-Vietnamkrig er pro-Vietnamkrig.
En annen del av artikkelen klager på at kartet han brukte har en legendefeil.
Hersh presiserer at kartet «ikke er nøyaktig». Det er en underdrivelse.
Det er jo 95% riktig, bare at legenden har motsatt farge på marine og luft baser. Det spiller ingen rolle for artikkelen.
Flere ganger i artikkelen bruker de Forsvaret som kilde for å finne ut om Forsvaret ødela Nordstream. Er det dette som skal være bedre journalistikk en My Lai Massacre (Som forsvaret i USA og i Norge nektet), MHChaos (Som forsvaret i USA og i Norge nektet), Highway of Death (Som forsvaret i USA og i Norge nektet), Abu Gharib (Som forsvaret i USA og i Norge nektet), Saringassangrepet i Syria (Som forsvaret i USA og i Norge nektet)?
His reporting has always relied on anonymous sources, and has always panned out in the long run. Nothing's changed, we're just not far enough removed from the war in Syria for the propaganda to lose control of the narrative in the west.
Your three sources are all undeniable propaganda. If you don't think Tucker Carlson is a serious journalist, that's perfectly understandable, but surely even the bottom of the barrel is more serious than the literal agents of the governments you're at war with? If I was Putin, I'd also turn down the literal BBC. Libs are so up their own ego they can't imagine someone not wanting to be filtered through their state's propaganda apparatus.
You can just switch suppliers? Like how is it in your interest to have someone bomb your less competitive supplier? Do libs not have a problem with monopolies even in the abstract??
"Middle East". "The region".
Let me guess, your take is that they are genetically predispositioned to conflict and what they need is superior Aryans to enforce a tight framework for them to follow for their own good?
Is there a source without links to the regime in the UK? The UK is considered a 'systemic rival' to the EU by the EU, so any claims by UK state-affiliated media should be viewed through a lens of foreign propaganda.
Okay so reading between the lines, it's about tourist services and has no impact on 99.9% of the country?
Who are these people?
Which abuses?
Based on what? Who warned? Who are they?
Viktor Orban is a communist actually, says their expert. For more insight into the overwhelming intellect of their expert, I present to you his pinned tweet. https://nitter.poast.org/daniel_freund/status/1766097991180382216#m
Note this expert is not the 'they' from earlier.
From who? Your readers certainly, but anyone who follows world affairs knows that their 'human rights record with the Uighurs' is completely clean. Since they can't publish that conspiracy theory any more, now they just hope you infer it.
There's a link "Similar deals were struck with Italy", and then they're just in uniform. ::: spoiler images
:::But the article keeps saying "secret police", including in this article
And then the article just kinda becomes China Bad.
It leverages China's construction and project management expertise, because it's an infrastructure programme.
That's his job. You shake the hands of the other world leaders when you go to official functions.