Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AR
Posts
0
Comments
233
Joined
1 mo. ago

  • Except in this case...there are no enforcers. At all.

    There is no mechanism in place to actually enforce a court ruling, if the executive branch decides to ignore it. There is no mechanism in place to enforce legislation that's been passed by Congress, if the executive branch decides to ignore it. There aren't even any mechanisms in place to enforce Constitutional amendments that should actively restrict the executive branch's actions. They had a lot to say about what the executive branch should not be allowed to do...but they seemingly forgot to include any way of ensuring they would be held accountable, if they didn't follow the rules.

    There are literally NO "checks and balances" in place to enforce anything if the executive branch decides to ignore the other two branches of government. It's like passing legislation that declares murder a crime...but not including any consequences for actually committing it.

  • Some systems, though, have actual mechanisms for enforcement attached to them. But apparently none of that was included in the legal framework that the entire country is built on.

    "Hey! You can't do that! That very clearly violates Constitutional law."

    "Oh, yeah? What are you going to do about it?"

    (checks Constitution) "Oh...uhhh. I guess nothing?"

  • It's sad to realize that there never really were any "checks and balances". It was all based on an honor system, that relied entirely on no one trying to cross any boundaries.

    As soon as Trump pushed even slightly against those so-called guardrails, they simply fell over.

  • Trump didn't "win" his case against ABC. They settled, despite the fact that the judge who presided over Trump's rape case acknowledging that Trump did in fact, "rape" E. Jean Carroll. That's just not the legalese term used in the charges against him.

  • What "solutions" are there? We just had an election. And at the moment, there is no real opposition party. The Liberals and Conservatives are basically aligned on most of this, so between the two of them, they have a potential super majority to pass anything they want.

    Anyone having buyers remorse at this point, is shit out of luck.