You joke, but can you honestly tell me this place wouldn't be full of people making trolley problem ""arguments"" about the obviously correct choice to make?
On the contrary, a regular, by-the-book monopoly game is relatively short. It lasts forever because people don't follow the rules and house rule catch-up mechanics - precisely because the rules as written are obviously lopsided and people can instinctively tell they're unfair.
I've had the thought that if I were to design a psyop campaign, a pretty solid option for dominating the discussion would be to come out swinging and accuse everyone else of being an agent. That way, people have to either constantly defend against accusations, or they conclude, rightly, the accusations are baseless and decide to disregard the very idea that there is a psyop going on.
The problem is you're not saying the magic words. Actually parsing an argument is out of fashion, so you gotta sprinkle your posts with stuff like "free Taiwan" or "fuck Putin" or whatever, so the LLM they paste your posts into to summarise them can understand them.
I change it to whatever track I'm on. Komm, süßer Tod!