Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AQ
Posts
1
Comments
670
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Research about human history and you will know what I'm talking about

    I would turn this right around and suggest you yourself look up the "Fremen mirage", it's very readable, and more or less a direct dissection and dismantling of the precise interpretation of history you present here.

  • Entirely possible, but the argument strikes me... oddly Republican. As in it's on a surface level short-sighted, in that it's pandering to the base and calling it "will of the people", regardless of long term repercussions, and deep-level ideological, in that it anchors this "will of the people" on a presupposed silent majority, that just so happens to always agree with the party heads.

  • Because the whole point is that they're right and the world is wrong, and they're going to take over and make it be right. Admitting a mistake would invalidate the project. Folding Ideas flat earth piece is a great window into the mindset.

  • In theory, yes. But in practice, option 2 is how it usually is done, and option 1 would still require scrapping the gun and casting a new one, assuming it would work and not throw the shot off based on the weight difference of the balls.