And would be correct. But if we're planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That's the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
That's like saying you can read a sentence written in rot13. Technically yes, you can decipher it, but it's not as easy. The spaces are used for a reason. Same with punctuation.
You know that trick where people can mostly recognise words with scrambled letters, as long as the first and last are right? Long, unknown words scramble that, and force you to parse them "manually", and even then, in your own example, you can easily misread (and then have to go back and correct yourself) cANYou.., canYOUREad.., ..ceEVENTho.., ..venTHOUGHT-HEREar.., ..ghTHE-REARen..,
But also, they do have a point: education isn't, or rather shouldn't be, just a means to get a better job. We don't think of someone who takes singing or playing lessons as "failed" if they don't become a professional musician. A day labourer with an art degree isn't worse than one without one
It's by design very verbose and "English"-like, like instead of x=yz it would go "MULTIPLY y BY z GIVING x", the idea was that it would read almost like natural language, so that non-tech staff could understand it.
I wonder if you could make a fuse that could reliably distinguish the T-series from NATO box tanks by weight.