Skip Navigation

Posts
12
Comments
151
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Could we stop pushing articles monetizing fear amd outrage on this community to the top and post about actual technology

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • I oppose the inital idea of building high speed rail line next to a highway with only goal of making drivers feel bad on purpose as I dont see shitting on a minor group of radicals a meaningful way of helping whole society

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/us/legislation-protects-drivers-injure-protesters/index.html

    is outdated

    https://www.factcheck.org/2019/07/protections-for-drivers-who-hit-protesters-didnt-pass/

    except Oklahoma

    https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/22/us/oklahoma-law-drivers-protesters/index.html

    You live in a bubble world where you feel comfortably smug and want to talk down to other people. You are stuck on a Reddit mentality and it disgusts me.

    Its my perspective on you

    Also, since you smugly (and deepy ignorantly) claimed no one kills anyone on purpose because you’re that high on your own farts in that bubble world of yours, here’s some people that kill on purpose, a lot more than no one. The source should be liberal enough for you to not whine about “bias” either. Maybe. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/hate-incidents

    Its easy to find on internet people killing in US.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=shooting&t=fpas&iar=news&ia=news

    Ultimate measure of safety is percieved personal safety. I have to admit I didnt know situation in US is so bad with over half of people feeling unsafe

    https://www.newsweek.com/young-americans-most-likely-feel-unsafe-daily-basis-poll-1728660

    As I live in a country where 13% feel unsafe

    https://www.britishpoles.uk/do-poles-feel-safe-in-their-country/

    Realistically speaking ordinary people probably dont encounter agression on daily basis as they run errand, but violent acts happen more often so more people feel unsafe. Ordinary people dont kill for sure

    Carbrains go out of their way to make pedestrians and cyclists feel bad on purpose, and society subsidizes their planet-burning nonsense and needlessly plans cities around humoring their personalized pollution machines. Fuck 'em.

    I still disagree with your view of drivers on a highway

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • I want transportation system to be improved for people's welldom and without trying to impose any views sacrifiing quality in the process

    "See these losers on train? They built 20% longer route only because they wanted to make passagers see losers on highway"

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • What problem are you solving by

    build high speed rail next to freeways only because it would make drivers feel like complete losers all the time

    ?

    People suffer from not optimal train route and see it as they drive on a highway

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • You dont want to solve any problem. You want to make people suffer

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • Make options better. If two cities are linked by highway and objectively better rail line and majority of people still choose to travel on highway then there is a problem somewhere, but building second train line next to highway wont solve anything.

    Otherewise if two cities are connected only with highway, then why how people travelling on it would make worse decision if it was their only option?

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • You are stuck on twitter mentality where everyone is radicalized and fights the other side.

    You describe people as monsters. Go outside, touch grass, no one kills anyone on purpose. System is problem, not

    Carbrains

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • People on driving on highways drive on them either because they need to, rural public transit is non-existent, it is cheaper or long distance transit is shit. They have their reasons and seeing train flying by wont change them unless it makes a better alternative.

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • Why do you want to make people feel bad on purpose?

  • Connects to satellite and uses mmwaves, cant receive fm radio

  • This finding wont fix anything and will only make car-brained vs commie-bikers flame war worse

    1. Google controls RCS servers. Collects data and sales it. Apple adopting RCS would mean monopoly situation
    2. Yes, a FOSS protocol/standard would be better

    Open standard is the only option

    3.

    RCS is at least allowed to be used by other companies so it’s at least a small step in the right direction

    ...of a single company controlling major sms functions turned on by default by every phone?

  • No, its not available. There is no FOSS RCS app, because its not available