I feel like the fact an ISP can just flatout say that should really scream oligopoly issues. Not just the fact the other company is just as bad, but the fact that they (the competitor) is fully aware that the switch is too costly to do.
...Do you...do you want there to be a correlation with "not supporting genocide" and "antisemitism?
Because if not, I don't see why there is any issue with protecting the jewish sites. They should not have to suffer because of people who are falsely correlating the two.
I said that in a confusing manner, but basically: There's a good chance people are using the war as an excuse to perform antisemitic acts. Just because we don't associate with those acts doesn't mean they aren't going to happen, and we should still be encouraging those acts be prevented.
They probably don't want all those people realizing they can install extensions manually, because then they'd need to actively scan for and block extension installations.
That's not moving goalposts, you're just arguing semantics. People generally think of eliminate when they say prevent in this kind of conversation....
If anything if they went "prevention" and not "eliminate" like in your sense...it would be even dumber because it would just make the steamdeck a more restrictive x86-processor computer compared to the systems people were already comparing it to up until it's release
Imagine how it would've gone down if people were saying "Of course you can do that, it's a PC" if people responded with "Yeah, except it's 10x harder to do things you could normally do on PC". They wanted it to be close to how a PC is, it was part of the advertising campaign.
And if you're going to flaunt your title you should probably actually...you know...say something that pertains to that knowledge you have.
This just seems like blind fanboyism. As great as the steamdeck is there's no reason to act like it's doing things it's not actually doing. It was designed the way it was because it had to be, there doesn't need to be anything whimsical about it.
No they couldn't, it's fucking Linux. They'd have to tie the controller drivers hostage to "lock it down", and at that point they'd hit so many hiccups with legitimate users.
Like they'd have to pull so many things from Linux (in particular Proton) to "DRM-ify" the steamdeck.
And as I think someone else just posted, some of the stuff they'd need to lock-down aren't even things Valve has control over. Like I said Proton but Valve doesn't own proton.
Though I don't think that's too big a loss when you're using it to sleep. If you used time stop for something that was both exhausting and wasting your time, that'd probably be worse honestly.
It would certainly become noticeable after awhile since as you said, it's one third of your life.
I mean, it probably depends on how happy you are with your life.
Depending on how it works i'd probably just use time stop to lose less time from sleeping. There's a lot of ways to improve your life with time stop before ever delving into morals.
Companies are also a shitshow who defrauds consumers. Especially ISPs. I don't see how this is remotely an argument.
Like it isn't even an argument. ISPs rank highest among the worst companies in the country.