A Black student was suspended for his hairstyle. The school says it wasn’t discrimination
I don't get why so many people feel the need to defend big corporations this much. It's not like they're going to share the profits with the people who defend them, nor do they probably care.
If anything, the industry will just use whatever ammo they can to exploit more people.
Without maintaining and creating protections, they will roll back until there are almost none. Our current labor rights didn't come for free, they were fought for.
It's only anecdotal, but a lot of the people I know who were hateful like that while growing up actually did come out as LGBTQ+. Some were trans, some were gay, some were bi, etc.
Some of them are just a-holes though. One dude complained about a gay classmate. He never liked it when I asked him why he was thinking about what the other guy was doing with his bits so much. I've always thouht it was a fair question. I never did get an answer, though.
For real, though.
I'm tall, but I'm not THAT tall. I already have lots of back problems, even though I always bend with my knees when I'm crouching or reaching for something on the ground.
Most of the world simply isn't built for tall people. You might have no leg room, you might hit your head on many car door frames, amusement park rides are too small/short for you, many normal shirts fit like crop tops, and many pants fit like water-highs. Of course, you can't forget people's incessant NEED to announce to you that you are in fact, tall. (Gee, I haven't noticed lol.) Forget about many long-sleeved tops, too. That's a fun one in the winter sometimes.
It's also really annoying to have people regularly tell you that your own personal experience with being tall is wrong. Like I'm sorry to hear that some people may wish they were taller, but it doesn't magically make the legitimate problems that being tall causes go away. Not having those problems would be so nice.
I'm not at all saying being short is a walk in the park, but being tall isn't always a walk in the park, either. You can be tall and still lack social skills, confidence, charisma, etc. I can promise you that. Becoming tall probably won't fix that, either.
Growing up, I used to always want to visit the US.
Now, I refuse to step foot in it. No tourism will ever be worth risking my life, or risking my partners life. I'll spend my money somewhere else.
I feel horrible for everyone who has to suffer because of these changes. It sounds less and less like what I once believed the US to stand for.
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
I wonder if they would be able to team up with eachother against unity.
I'm not a lawyer, and I don't know exactly where everyone involved resides. That being said, I imagine pooling resources might help with those costs, if possible. There's certainly more than two gaming companies that are being screwed by this.
To be honest, I would contribute to a legitimate go fund me for them. Fuck unity.
What bathroom should someone born with both parts use?
I think they should follow suit with some of the other extremely spicey foods. A retailer that I used to go to made you sign a waver and required that you prove that you were at least a certain age to buy it. Part of getting the waiver to sign was being told what it can do.
I didn't buy the hot sauce myself, but the staff explained that it could legitimately burn your skin if you left it on for too long. I wish I remember what the sauce was called.
I was shocked at the time that you had to sign a waver to buy hot sauce. It was a weird concept to me. Incidents like this must be why. It makes sense, now that I think about it.
Ok, let's forget the trees or any scenery for a moment. Let's say they don't exist, and that the plane is in an open, and empty area.
Planes are very finicky things. If the angles aren't right, it won't be able to fly. If you look at an airplane wing from the side, they are normally shaped a bit like long tear drops. After gaining it's initial momentum, the plane is kind of lifted by gliding through the air pressure. Plane wings are shaped that way to make the air move faster over the top of the wing. When the air moves faster, the pressure of that air decreases. So the pressure on the top of the wing is less than the pressure on the bottom of the wing. The difference in pressure creates a force on the wing that lifts the wing of the plane up into the air.
Airplanes are full of many things that are pretty complex. If we changed airplanes to be able to "roll over" for safety, we would lose that special system that allows the lift to happen.
Since planes are so finicky, planes with different purposes will usually be built differently. Since they still have to be able to fly, adding one thing may sometimes means removing another thing. Those particular planes were never meant to make those maneuvers, and they weren't built to handle them. It would be like upgrading a car's engine block to be turbo-powered, then keeping the same coolant system and expecting it to run fine. You have to respect the equipment and follow guidelines, as they are usually there for a good reason.
The idea was that everyone would know not to do that (via their pilot licence), and that it would be ok to have specialty planes. The plane was never meant to move that way, and the wings weren't fortified for those angles.
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
I try not to take it personally, because I have NO idea what's happening in that person's life, or what's happening in their head.
What if some of those people are deaf or mute? What if their parent just died and they're doing their best to not break down in tears? What if they had the most infuriating day/night of their life, and they are so upset that they can't be polite? What if they speak a foreign language? What if they have in-ear headphones that are tough to see?
There are many situations where I would feel silly for expecting a response, and realistically, many of them would be invisible to strangers.
For example, you're probably not going to tell someone who wished you good morning that you can't talk because you just found out your baby is going to be stillborn. You're probably going to try to shut things out while you process the intense emotions.
Please don't take it so personally, and maybe try to be a bit more empathetic to strangers. Neither you or I likely even have a chance of knowing their reasons.
I don't know about you, but I would honestly feel like a terrible person for getting annoyed at someone for not talking in the example above. One you say something, it's too late to undo it.
Please please please remember that a LOT of people likely have things going on that you're unaware of.
Just wait, in about 10 to 20 years, people will be complaining that not enough young people are doing those jobs anymore. (Some people already are to an extent, lol. They probably have no idea about this though.)
What a horrible situation. I hope that everyone is able to find sustainable work. I can't imagine suddenly losing most of my salary while being left with the same bills.
Regarding the unionizing, for me, a big push towards it was seeing what's happening in many companies without one. A good union can help in so many ways. I've seen the writing on the wall with some situations that have happened over the last 5 to 10 years. Bad companies are trying to remove a lot of worker protections, and it feels like we really need to remind them that they aren't invulnerable.
My union for example, has some of the best employment lawyers in the country, and we don't have to pay on the spot if we need one. Previously, fighting a wrongful dismissal over unsafe working conditions would have taken time and money that many of us don't have. Now, we know we won't be screwed.
I would argue that a good company should want a union. They protect and guide both "sides", and if they're doing everything right, a union really shouldn't be a hassle for a company to deal with.
Gasp!
Now what will head management do when they want to give random people tours of their company! Think of all the empty desk spaces potential investors might see! (That's one thing I'll be happy to see hopefully end eventually. The people giving the tours where I work barely know anything about any of the processes or procedures. )
On a serious note, even from the capitalism mindset, this doesn't make a lot of sense. Even if they already paid out a lease for their building, they would still be saving on regular maintenance costs, and they would have a good reason to downsize their physical location when possible. (Saving money, long term). Fewer employees being at work may also mean fewer workplace injuries. (Saving money, long term).
I would need to see the whole interaction. Some people are just "lovely" individuals.
I have no clue if the poster was one of those people based in what's here, so I can't say myself.
One day, I had to tell someone that they should research pet safety before giving other people pet safety advice. This person was recommending people to feed their dogs things that are well known to seriously poison and harm them. Apparently, according to that person, all dogs can eat anything because their grandma's one dog was fine.
I responded with links showing that the food was in fact harmful, and a lovely mod banned me for "arguing". It filled me with rage. Not because I was banned, but because the OG misinformation was still up, but all of the corrections were removed. Other people's comments correcting it were removed, too. Fuck accurate information intended to keep pets safe, I guess.
I hope that the random people who saw the post looked it up before trusting that person.
Everyone should remember that no one is immune to this stuff. Anyone who truly believes that they are immune to is probably more susceptible to it. No one is right 100% of the time.
As a generation, we don't all share the same headspace. What you or I might be good at spotting might not be so easy for someone else to spot. I would love to agree with you that our generation as a whole is good at seeing this stuff, but I've also seen some pretty shocking things over the last 5 years. Some people will believe things blindly, if it makes them feel better than someone else. Some people have even been taught to do so.
As much as I love gen Z, I think that a lot of people within it really struggle with empathy and critical thinking. Unfortunately, I think that those missing traits also make them much more susceptible to believing random things. They give the rest of us a bad name when they do that, and I really hope that they seriously work on verifying information, if nothing else.
We need to do much better, overall, if we want to legitimately claim that we're better for this stuff as a generation. We need to properly hold people accountable if/when bad stuff happens, especially if those bad things happen because someone didn't bother to verify something before they acted.
Almost all of us know how to use the internet ffs, it should really be easy to just take the 10 seconds to search something.
I'm not going to mention the company I work for, but I can verify that psychology is being used to advertise to kids. Mass manufactured food industry.
They will pick out very specific colours, mascot attributes, shapes and more to draw kids attention.
I shit you not, there's a certain cookie brand with a happy bear on the box that has eyes that look upwards. The entire purpose of this is to subconsciously make kids think that they're making eye contact with the happy mascot, so they'll trust it more. Certain colours are also believed to trigger more hunger in consumers. They play on so many factors in advertising that it isn't funny.
This is just one example, but this is definitely a thing that is happening in many companies.
It might be a perspective thing, and how you both define "rich".
If someone gets by every week on ramen, a salary of $100k/year would seem like a crap ton of money. Doubly so if most of their community is also living off of ramen. One year on that salary alone would be life changing for this person.
If someone lives in a pricy area and maybe has a few kids, a salary of $100k wouldn't seem like nearly as much. Doubly so if most of their community makes that much. One year on that salary is just another year for this person.
For some people, "rich" is not having to worry about starving and knowing that they have a roof over their head. It's about finally being able to buy non-necessities, and it's about being able to have things just for enjoyment. Some people are very month to month in terms of costs and bills.
To others, "rich" is being able to buy expensive boats and cars. It's about having excess wealth and never having to worry about any monetary problems. These people might think of millionaires and billionaires when they hear the word "rich".
Of course some people would consider $100k/year rich. I'm certain that MANY people would take that salary boost in a heartbeat.
I'm not saying that $100k would set you up anywhere near as much as $1m would, but it's a hell of a lot more money than many people can make.
In 10 years, that salary is $1,000,000. For someone making $50k/year, it would take 20 years for them to make that much. For someone making $25k/year, it would take 40 years for them to earn that much. I would feel disingenuous telling someone who makes $25k/year that making $100k wouldn't be becoming "rich" to them.
Maybe that's their monetary sweet spot, and they rely on other things to finish fulfilling their personal definition of "rich". Family, friends, hobbies, etc.
If an instance doesn't want a negative reputation for doing certain things, they should prioritize not doing those certain things.
If you act like an arse, people are going to think that you're an arse. If you want people to think that you're pleasant, you should try acting pleasant. If someone acts like an arse but expects to be called pleasant, I would think that person is delusional. Too many people are like this, then get upset when people don't want to deal with them.
Frankly, life is too short to deal with certain people. Why would I waste my time and happiness for a troll?
I might block the instance soon. It doesn't seem like I would be losing much at the moment.
Some crips in California wear them, IIRC. It could be regional, too.
Smaller gangs will sometimes use a colour that's unused in their area, even if it might already be known to represent something else in another place.
My school has so many problems with that that they banned any non-black shoelaces and also implemented an expensive uniform that was ugly.