Gotta have more users for text posts. I don't know about you guys but if I see a text post with 10 comments I move on unless I have something good to say. I'm way more likely to get involved if 500 comments are already there. Does this make sense? Probably not, but it's very intuitive.
Yeah I've worked my way into a profession where if you're not the lucky 1/500 that gets the full time, tenure track job, you've just got to work at 2-3 different universities part time, with no insurance. There are worse choices I could have made, but academia was not a good one. At this point I will never have a full time job unless I change professions; once you've adjuncted long enough you're essentially toxic to any hiring committee. And as far as I can tell, I unlike other industries, personal and university connections are actively detrimental; it reflects poorly on a department to hire people who've got a connection to the department.
I can't get full time jobs. I've only ever had one and got laid off. Theyre also harder to get because your employer has to pay for health insurance if you work more than 28 hours per week.
I'm also a weird case cause I'm an adjunct professor. Precarity comes with the territory.
It's not much of a robot if it requires a person pumping air into it to move. That's like saying a bike is a robot, as long as you've got someone pedaling.
This sounds wild but you don't live near Seattle, do you? We just had a minor earthquake and the next morning all my smoke detectors went hog wild. Apparently that can happen?
The whole premise of this veto is that the infrastructure isn't set up for mushrooms to be used as a safe medicine. Which completely ignores the fact that most people who use mushrooms do so recreationally; who gives a shit if it can or can't be used by the medical system? That would be great, but it has no bearing on whether mushrooms should be legalized.
Foxhole. New war starts today. Getting a few of my friends on and working on building vehicles and tanks for the war effort.