AmidFuror @ AmidFuror @fedia.io

Posts

0

Comments

2,119

Joined

1 yr. ago

Organisms have incredibly complex biochemical makeup. Flowers will contain minute levels of formaldehyde and other toxic compounds. If there is no floor on what it takes to be "toxic," then only 100% purified chemical compounds could be included.

It would be better to determine what "safe" levels are based on regulatory body recommendations and then try to stay under those.

Thanks.

I'll let you know in a year.

I get memes. I just avoid the communities dedicated to them.

Total Nucleic Acid (mixed DNA and RNA extracted from a sample together)

We're just posting different versions of this to the sub community / magazine now?

Both kinds are a disappointment.

Title is confusing. That language could mean you missed one day (what you meant) or that you never went (couldn't make it even one day).

What's the pay period? A 5-day week or longer?

This is absolutely true. Carriers are very vulnerable to advanced anti-ship missiles. But people with staunch political views have alternative truths they prefer to see propagated, so you've been punished.

Risks and benefits. There are very few severe adverse reactions to vaccines. Yet some will die after receiving one. Do we now allow infectious disease to kill and maim instead? No, we weigh the risks.

If we can get the same benefit with lower risks, like asbestos replacements, we do that. Still better than dying in a fire, though.

It's the top of the shill ladder.

We need to ratchet this up, actually. Not just those who hate America. but those who have publicly declared in the last 12 years that America is anything less than great. Citizen or not, if we have record of you declaring America is not great, I want you gone. Start with the ones who said it loudest and to the biggest crowds.

Meanwhile, trips to El Salvador are ramping up!

These kinds of nuanced scientific assessments don't do well with the far left in the Fediverse. They'll take you to be a shill for Big Someone. One day, we'll live in a world free of chemicals!

For impeachment, the voters are going to have to do their job removing the Republican majority.

It's pretty obvious that quantitative risk data were not provided in the articles or links. The study doesn't claim to produce such data.

I'm not even convinced you would know such data if you saw it, but you're quite confident that if one digs hard enough, one will find it.

Since you were the slightly snarkier of the two responses, can you point out where in the article it quantities the risk? Not the concentration vs limits. If it's discussed in the links, just tell me which link to follow. No need to show where.

I would normally follow the links to the primary peer-reviewed journal article, but there isn't one.

If your bullshit detectors are going off on this one, you're not alone. Can we please quantify the risk?

I know it's on your exclusion list, but my phone autocorrects its to it's every time. I have to catch it and backspace to restore it.

Autocorrecting a misspelled word is one thing. Autocorrecting a correctly spelled word for a more common word is just wrong.

We in the West just don't understand that it is culturally OK to be authoritarian dickweeds in China and the territories it has colonized.