Real humans who would be born and could potentially have children, passing whatever genetic edits they have (intended and off-target) into the gene pool.
As I said, I understand just fine. I'm just not willing to hand-wave away the unforgivable parts of our original constitution just so we can all feel warm and fuzzy about it.
You're giving me the same line that always gets trotted out to defend historical bullshit. I understand the argument, I've heard it before, and I don't buy it. In the modern day (where we live and are conversing) the constitution has a history of blatant human rights violations. We should recognize and acknowledge that, not excuse it for being "from a different time."
Was it though? It institutionalized slavery for nearly a century, was blatantly sexist for well over a century, and enshrined a majoritarian system that created the political duopoly that has plagued the US since its inception.
This is kinda backwards. Biodiversity is a result of random mutation over millions of years. Evolution is the result of selective pressures "choosing" from that diversity. It doesn't create or provide biodiversity, it depends on it, so biodiversity should be the one providing crabs. Evolution just thinks they're neat.
They're looking for a "fuck you" to the US government more than they're looking for a new social media. Maybe it will stick as a popular platform, but I suspect it was chosen more for its name and ties to the CCP than any actual features.
Those are still included in TKLs though...