This is like the definition of a "conservative". Progress shouldn't happen because their not ready for it. They are comfortable with what they use and are upset that other people are moving ahead with new things. New things shouldn't be allowed.
Most games have the ability to downscale so that people like this can still play. We don't stop all progress just because some people aren't comfortable with it. You learn to adjust or catch up.
Your dumb conspiracy theories are based on fear and cowardice.
The amount of people that have been "hurt" because of the vaccine is statistically insignificant, and it's no different than the number of people that would have issues at taking any other "safe" over the counter medicine.
Your entire belief against has been crafted and pushed by foreign actors, and your just gullible enough to buy into it.
But your ignorance and pride will never let you believe it. You want to keep being the fool, that's your prerogative.
You clowns have been saying that shit for years lol. Nothing's happened to anyone. Sorry bro, the facts don't support your feelings, you uneducated snowflake.
Cletus, you can say "fuck" on the Internet. Then again, I'm inclined to believe that given your lack of punctuation or correct spelling throughout your entire post, that maybe you think it's actually spelled "fuk".
And God damn do I love the hypocrisy on "believing the narrative". Sure, we listen to the advice of the medical community, but at least I'm not taking my medical advice from a bunch of 4chan incels and facebook-addicted, soccer moms. The "narrative" lmfao, bro your entire narrative was spoonfed to you by the internet you bottom feeder.
What next mate? You wanna harp on about how vaccines are making people magnetic or the evil 5G?
I've seen a lot more goofy statements like this, to the point that it feels purposeful. Find a small article that's growing, about a topic that people are interested, and make totally incorrect statements about "Dems" and then just shuffle off when challenged on them.
Democrats wholeheartedly support unions, advocate for the rights of workers, and support the rights of the people, whereas Conservatives do not. They take a more business-oriented stance that fights against unions, providing better results for business owners.
On one hand, this will fucking suck....however, no one will be able to argue that global warming isn't real as this will be the very real consequences to ignoring climate change.
Yeah. It's bad. In case anyone can't see the writing on the wall, they are going to give everyone vouchers so that they can afford to leave public schools and go to private schools and then gut them later.
The vouchers will further tank public schools. Republicans will then be able to argue that public schools are failing, that attendance rates as abysmal, and they should shut down funding to them (and conservative voters will eat that shit up as their entire world view is based on sound bites they got from Fox News). I bet the voucher programs don't last much longer after that once there is no alternative.
An all powerful sky wizard can do whatever he wants. Imaginary Sky Daddy can be rendered in whatever way he see fits without people like you "defining" how he does and doesn't work.
It's all just goofy conjecture anyways used to control people. "Murder in the name of" and all that insanity.
This is fucked. They are allowing your tax dollars to be used for Christian Fundamentalist Schools. All that fear mongering about "brainwashing" your kids with CRT and the LGBT-agenda in public schools that never existed, and the Republicans are literally trying to push a religious agenda down the throats of this citizens of this state.
How long before girls are banned from the higher level STEM classes and instead required to take Home Ec and urged to be stay at home mothers and wives, you know, like Harrison Butker and his wife suggested?
"The court’s three liberal justices dissented from Wednesday’s order. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan indicated only that they would have denied the requests to put the federal court’s ruling on hold. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, explaining that in her view it is too early for Purcell to apply and there was no reason for the Supreme Court to intervene at this stage."
No, they dissented due to, in their argument, a principle that they believe should not be used in this decision. They believe that this case should not have been decided by the Supreme Court and instead let the lower courts decision stay, that there was no reason for them to get them involved.
So, back to your main statement, do the "Dems" still want to change things up? Or was your statement perhaps a bit antagonistic and meant to rile up the next moron that lacks the ability to read and properly comprehend a news article?
Not sure where you got that from as the article states that the new set of plaintiffs are not black and are claiming that its racist.
From another article:
"Nine days later, a group of 12 white voters went to a different federal court, where they argued that S.B.8 is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander – that is, it sorted voters based primarily on their race."
Please. By all means, explain where you got "the Dems" from this. Good luck!
Okay. I hate any music that references all of the following pandering terms: trucks, boots, whiskey, blue jeans, dirt, drinkin', beer, and. "back roads".
If you removed the lyrics from almost every modern US "Country" song, they wouldn't be so bad, by holy shit...it's like you can't have a country song without whiskey and blue jeans sung in an overdone Kentucky or Mid-Western accent. It's essentially fan service for country boys and girls. Half of those singers haven't touched so much as a rake in their entire lives and for some reason people make this genre their entire fucking identity.
I mean, it really shouldn't be off the table though. It's genuinely not a bad idea to at least balance the court. But, it should be regarded as sort of a "Last Ditch Effort" to save the court if it comes to it.
Crustaceous*