Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AL
Posts
20
Comments
210
Joined
4 yr. ago

  • Reminder of the Liberal's record on proportional representation: "Liberals never wanted to “make every vote count.”… Electoral reform has become a bonbon offered at election. As far back as 1919, Liberals have campaigned on the promise of proportional representation"

    Mark Carney's position on electoral reform: "open". However...

    1. He’s an economist, and the mathematics pairs quite nicely with the mathematics of electoral systems.
    2. His public persona is that he is intelligent. But when asked specifically about electoral reform and proportional representation, he says he’s uncertain and open to exploring options? Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts?
  • Reminder of the Liberal's record on proportional representation: "Liberals never wanted to “make every vote count.”… Electoral reform has become a bonbon offered at election. As far back as 1919, Liberals have campaigned on the promise of proportional representation"

    Mark Carney's position on electoral reform: "open". However...

    1. He’s an economist, and the mathematics pairs quite nicely with the mathematics of electoral systems.
    2. His public persona is that he is intelligent. But when asked specifically about electoral reform and proportional representation, he says he’s uncertain and open to exploring options? Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts.
  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Reminder of the Liberal's record on proportional representation: "Liberals never wanted to “make every vote count.”… Electoral reform has become a bonbon offered at election. As far back as 1919, Liberals have campaigned on the promise of proportional representation"

    Mark Carney's position on electoral reform: "open". However...

    1. He’s an economist, and the mathematics pairs quiet nicely with the mathematics of electoral systems.
    2. His public persona is that he is intelligent. But when asked specifically about electoral reform and proportional representation, he says he’s uncertain and open to exploring options? Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts?

    Only the Greens/NDP consistently support proportional representation.

  • I wrote this post about the objectives of the fairvote community.

    As far as I know, !fairvote@lemmy.ca is the only online community dedicated towards this cause.

    So a lot of the current work is building the movement, and getting those that already support the movement organized.

    We know a federal election is coming up, and the more this movement grows, the more politicians will bend to our demands (as they should in a democracy).

    1. But it continues the notion that we should rely on them for information, when they have most certainly poisoned Canadian culture and politics.
    2. Also, by sending users to an American site, it increases their revenues, when this money could have gone to a Canadian media site.
    3. And if you aren't already aware, Canadian owned media is deliberately neglected because it's contrary to a particular elite group in this country... And yeah, we should support and grow Canadian owned media regardless of political party.

    But if you still insist on supporting American media...

  • I did join fairvote

    Thanks! In a time of uncertainty, you are help building a stronger Canadian democracy!

    Why do we resist proportional representation? Seems like a no brainer.

    I ask myself this about every other day. I echo the sentiments from this comment: that there is a massive disinformation campaign on PR.