Allero @ Allero @lemmy.today

Posts

15

Comments

2,188

Joined

2 yr. ago

Super valid!

My point is: there's little to brag about. But hey, I got that badge anyway.

Actually, yes. In many, many aspects Arch wiki requires a lot of prerequisite knowledge. Otherwise, you'll be better off following online guides.

Why not? It takes a few hours at most, and I get a new interesting experience.

It is amazing if you've settled on your distribution of choice, though.

Very easy nowadays, even manually with all the guides, so you can cross that one off quite easily.

Arch Wiki is great, but it's mostly oriented on people who already know something. And installation page should be very clearly written for absolute noobs.

Go ahead, install Arch on a VM (it's not hard at all, actually!) and get your medal.

Then keep with Endeavour and enjoy your ride :D

Installing Arch manually is not hard, and there are plenty of step-by-step guides.

Figuring out what you need next and then managing this mess is more complicated.

Source: I installed Arch manually btw

Why do you think so?

I may advise you to track previous actions and their outcomes. More often than not, it does work.

We can always do our best to make it closer.

Most people claim this to be Utopian, and then just try to tone it down in others, so their own compliance is not seen to themselves as weakness but rather "wisdom". No - it is a surrender, an act of learned helplessness.

Sure, it's hard to force politicians to abandon the concept of nations, and it's hard to bring a revolt to a population so compliant.

But everyone can make personal steps.

First, admit that patriotism is bullshit. There is no ground to be patriotic, and nothing realistically unites you with your "nation". You have more in common with a person of the same position on the other side of the globe than you have with the president of your very "own" country.

Second, watch your own preferences in people and what you factor in your decision. Maybe you give too much weight to where the person comes from? Is it that you label people in some way based on that characteristic alone?

Third, if you have the opportunity, form an international collective, reach out to specialists within other nations, or if you can't, see if you can build a collective or even just a friend group with the immigrants around you.

Fourth - advocate for people in other countries, learn what they face, what they get to endure. For example - do you know that the deadliest of recent wars was not in Ukraine or Palestine, but in Ethiopia? What do you know about the current situation in Myanmar, aside from the Facebook drama? Did you consider supporting women rights' causes in the Middle East?

Personal action and involvement will not allow you to fall for the traps the state tries to implant in your mind, and you'll be personally responsible for a small, but proud piece of international cooperation - one that should become commonplace to the point when it wouldn't make sense for anyone to draw divisions.

Human life is human life. Human suffering is human suffering - here or on the other side of the globe. The concepts of unity, hope, and cooperation are all universally recognized wherever you are. Why not step in?

We should band together based on mutual respect and common responsibility, and not based on someone telling us who to band with and who not to.

The concept of nation-state doesn't allow us to band with whoever we like, and calls to unite with people born in place X (and commonly against people born in place Y). The concept of state in general oversees and dictates our relationships more broadly.

Multitude of states all fostering loyalty to their rulers doesn't allow many people to look at those of other nations as equals and fellows with shared global goals. Sure, messages of international peace are commonplace, but hey, we should definitely exclude those pesky Chinese/Russians/Americans/Ukrainians/Israelis/Palestinians/whatever!

When we categorize people by nations through the lens of state, we put easy labels that are far from true. If someone's a Russian, he sure supports war in Ukraine. If someone's American, he sure is personally responsible for all the immigrant scare. If someone's born in Israel or China, clearly he's all on board with genocide!

At the same time, state-level patriotism fosters coming to terms with terrible people within the nation. Sure, our billionaires might be at fault in some ways, but it's better than other country's evil and corrupt billionaires! Our rulers are wise leaders, their rulers are cruel autocrats! My neighbor is a terrible person, but at least he's not one of those

<input the nation with bad stereotypes>

It forces us to make preference to people who may not deserve our support, who might be actively undermining our causes, it leads us to close our eyes on the sufferings of others outside our arbitrary group that doesn't even share our views and goals.

Now, I know it doesn't have to be that extreme, but patriotism is always showing preference to someone or something based on a very arbitrary characteristic, instead of honest and fair consideration. It's an intentionally cultivated fallacy.

On a personal note, I'd rather avoid ad hominem attacks if you'd like to keep a good faith discussion running. And, FYI, I never take any drugs, not even alcohol.

The state should not exist. We are people of Earth, and we should not be divided by someone. Divided, we are powerless to make a global change, and those who divide us reap all the benefits of this bullshit system.

State-level patriotism is always bullshit to begin with.

That's how you're tricked into loyalty based on the most arbitrary reasons.

Be the messenger of humanity and get curious about the Universe. People are brothers, and there's no pride in being born in one plot of land over the other.

Aha, caught that one, and indeed, you are right. Unmounts correctly now!

Should work, though MentalEdge proposed a more elegant solution. All it took was setting uid in /etc/fstab.

Maybe it could help you, too?

Thanks anyway for your response!

It worked, you nailed it! So, the problem was that with automount it was root that was mounting, which ended up breaking permissions. As a result, I could not unmount the drive, and Pika couldn't do backups. After setting the uid, it started to work properly as it began mounting under my name. As such, changing user to users was not required. But now I know the difference, so thank you anyway!

Case closed, and thank you again.

written before reading the article; it get the topic from another, more interesting and less imaginary, angle

Do we explore it post-Google or post-anything that would take its place?

Because those are two very different scenarios. There are plenty of Big Tech corps that are willing to take Google's place.

If we actually mean no one does search with targeted advertising and stuff, my bets are on more indie sites popping up, and Fediverse getting stronger as well.

We'll have more link indices, and more relevant search results hosted on different corners of the Internet.

On the negative: unless open-source projects step up their game, usability and quality of web interfaces will suffer dramatically. And without truly massive Fediverse or at least decent webrings, finding basic information and connecting to others might actually get harder.

Also ICE 👎

Beginners will always gravitate to what is easier.

The upstream tools (Docker in this case) must orient themselves more towards the newbies, not only the pros, if we want to see the progress here.

Personally, as a non-IT guy, I find myself fighting uphill battles every time I want to do something seemingly simple, because the basic tools we're offered are not made with common folk in mind. And I'm sort of an enthusiast - most people just won't bother if it's not plug&play, they don't have time and energy to figure everything out.

For now he's a candidate from the Democratic party

(not me downvoting)

I understand the concern with locally made software. However, I'd rather see something open-source come from the US than something closed source come from my own country.

Speaking of Konqueror, what about Falkon? It is the newer option by KDE team, and works on a more modern engine. And, it works on Windows.

Of course I mean pure ungoogled Chromium, without bloat on top.

Not only browser code consists of millions of lines, it is also audited by thousands of people, and, importantly, changes can be highlighted, which doesn't allow for them to go unnoticed.

Successful mass attacks with OSS typically require much more skill and resources as you need for you malicious code to be written in a way that stays unnoticed (and eventually, rather soon, it will be discovered, with all consequences).

With closed source programs, integrating malicious code is easy, and this code can stay there unnoticed for ages, so they are 100% "trust me bro, I don't do anything bad".

So, yes, OSS is more secure.