"Nobody owes you accepting you as equal" is also a form of dangerous elitism. Linux is built on the foundation of cooperation and mutual aid, and I don't think it's the right place to figure out who is more or less "valuable".
Someone who lacks some of the technical know-how of Linux might be useful to the community as a Linux advocate, or as someone with good ideas on user-friendly design, or something else entirely that can still be useful.
Besides, if we ever hope for "the year of Linux desktop" to be a real thing, we have to be inviting. Yes, most PC users are not technical specialists. Yes, they will have dumb and silly questions. Yes, many of such quesrions have already been answered before, and yes, they could have searched better.
But such is life. Maybe we have time and will for this, but most people don't. If we want for all our favorite programs and games to finally become Linux native, if we want to ensure Linux experience becomes smooth, if we don't want to be seen as a community of red-eyed nerds, we need all those people in. And there's no detriment to this greater than constant infighting and elitism, than forcing people to bury down the wikis instead of providing useful support, and so on. People will just...leave back for Windows, and that's it. Poof, one less potential supporter in an uphill battle to make Linux mainstream.
Now, I know how frustrating it may be to answer same questions again and again, in your free time, getting nothing for it. I understand it. But we shouldn't let frustration break the bonds that make it all work. If you don't feel like answering that same question, just...don't. That will be enough. Someone else will get them up to speed.
That's you, but it should be on the state level so that every parent is given everything to make parenthood go smooth.
People got used to comfort and are not willing to sacrifice their standards of living for having children, especially through a recession. Make them feel secure about their present and future - and birth rates will grow.
In my eyes, being adequately supported means not having any financial difference between having vs not having children. If that would be the case, there wouldn't be a financial incentive to not have them.
If we go above that (incentivise parenting even more), it's just throwing money at the problem in hopes it will go away. If someone will only have kids if they'll be rewarded on top of having extra expenses covered, they are basically parenting for money and this won't end well.
As per taking advantage of the social system - the more people overclaim something, the better the regulations become. There could be a certain ceiling on the types of support that could be taken at the same time, for example. As per unemployed folks living on subsidies - unless they have a valid reason they can't work (and there are those), they should get mandatory public employment if they stay in the unemployed status for a while - one that would respect their disabilities and limitations, if there are any, of course.
I fail to see advantages over the expansion of direct support for families with kids.
If such families would be adequately supported, parents wouldn't be so financially disadvantaged and this would automatically resolve the issue of assets as well.
Paying it as part of pensions on the condition of children working in the home country makes people's finances directly reliant on the actions of independent actors (their adult children) and punishes people who, for example, cannot have children in the first place due to medical reasons, lack of a partner, etc. It also doesn't bring financial support when it's needed the most.
And relying on asset accumulation and personal investments as a source of pension funding is quite odd to me to begin with, as salaries don't always reflect the good done for society (for example, public sector work is often paid more poorly, despite bringing maximum value for the state), and also because personal investments cannot be done with the same precision, competence and risk management as the funds do (and even if you invest in funds, they take a cut). I believe asset accumulation should be minimized in favor of public support nets (including decent pensions and good living conditions for everyone).
I guess you're getting downvoted by those offended. It absolutely is.
Note: I am left, communist in fact, but the way political topics are discussed is a clear doomer circlejerk. I'd love to at least see more variety over "Trump is stupid, Elon is mad, senators are bootlickers, death to Nazis, we're all gonna die". Like, yeah, we got it and we know it. What next? Any political action, maybe?
As a Synology owner, I already had enough - they have arbitrarily cut customer support to sanctioned jurisdictions, leaving me without the support they promised and I expected when paying for a device.
Next one will definitely be built from the ground up.
Nah, I started with Skyrim, and I played Oblivion without mods. It's not great, problematic in many places, but it is playable if you want to discover the story.
Oblivion is at least playable for newer gamers. It's not a good experience, but it is manageable.
Morrowind, for all its immense benefits, makes everyone who entered the game scene after 2010 scream in terror. I personally never left Balmora, because it's just a terrible experience by modern standards (graphics, character animation, controls, battle mechanics...), which is a great shame because the game seems to be great otherwise.
TES I and II, while deserving recognition, are very Doom-like in terms of gameplay, and I don't believe an adequate remake could be made, because they are so different they can't adequately be turned into a modern experience.
So, I guess for me all hopes are for Skywind, so I could finally walk the streets of Vivec without the need to fork my eyes.
As a third party, I feel I have to contend this.
"Nobody owes you accepting you as equal" is also a form of dangerous elitism. Linux is built on the foundation of cooperation and mutual aid, and I don't think it's the right place to figure out who is more or less "valuable".
Someone who lacks some of the technical know-how of Linux might be useful to the community as a Linux advocate, or as someone with good ideas on user-friendly design, or something else entirely that can still be useful.
Besides, if we ever hope for "the year of Linux desktop" to be a real thing, we have to be inviting. Yes, most PC users are not technical specialists. Yes, they will have dumb and silly questions. Yes, many of such quesrions have already been answered before, and yes, they could have searched better.
But such is life. Maybe we have time and will for this, but most people don't. If we want for all our favorite programs and games to finally become Linux native, if we want to ensure Linux experience becomes smooth, if we don't want to be seen as a community of red-eyed nerds, we need all those people in. And there's no detriment to this greater than constant infighting and elitism, than forcing people to bury down the wikis instead of providing useful support, and so on. People will just...leave back for Windows, and that's it. Poof, one less potential supporter in an uphill battle to make Linux mainstream.
Now, I know how frustrating it may be to answer same questions again and again, in your free time, getting nothing for it. I understand it. But we shouldn't let frustration break the bonds that make it all work. If you don't feel like answering that same question, just...don't. That will be enough. Someone else will get them up to speed.