That's why the scientific method is created, to keep to the things we can know about.
For things we cannot know, there's your space for faith. But it's more of a 'credo quia absurdum', than anything else.
You're perfectly fine in believing what you wish, but you're not trying to know. There's no apriori. Like Godel proved there's no way for logics to be coherent enough to prove anything outside of it.
The scientific method needs no proof to believe in. It embraces fallacy and tries to disprove rather than prove. This is way stronger as it argues from known things.
You night wanna look up the history of philosophy of the middle ages, they do a lot of fancy reasoning to make Faith and empiristic data work. They couldn't really find a way, so you might have the same trouble. Beautiful aruments, though.
Look at the time scale. The deaths of the 1912 sinking are taking about thrice the time to die and microsecond implosion took all year of 2023, if the time scale is too be believed.
Akasazh @ Akasazh @feddit.nl Posts 16Comments 3,561Joined 2 yr. ago
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana