I am absolutely in love with the show about the Fascist party ripping itself apart, I am appalled by the carnage left in it's wake. The no-true-scottsmanism that is showing is just another sign that the divide is getting deeper. If you ever said anything, thought anything, voted for anything, or posted anything that doesn't toe the party line exactly you owe a debt forever. That is what it's about though, what can I hold over you to control you.
So obviously fake, the note in the story is clean without creases, and was what uploaded by the document scanner the cops keep in the trunk of a car so that some Walmart brand website could be the only outlet to run it. Nice try spreading hate.
Sounds to me like he has plenty of power to end the strike, he can see the concrete requirements from the workers. Grant them, in full, strike ends, company safe. Sounds simple Mr. 21 Million plus perks.
"feds are going to be forced to act" for a federal agency to act that would require the enforcement of federal law, short of that it is all down to state action. Or am I misinterpreting intent, happens a lot to me?
Got that one, up to date on the book bannings, but it seemed that it was being suggested that by complying with that law Scholastic would be violating a federal law, this is an interesting argument, especially if is has some application to interstate commerce, or even if it would be a violation of individual state law to have an agreement predetermined with the district, before the company brought "controversial" books into the district.
Let it be known that I find book banning and "don't say gay" bills abhorrent, as I do with terminology that includes CRT including the history of slavery in the USA. I am trying only to get a better grasp of the mainstream arguments around this subject. I tend to see things in black and white (no pun intended, seriously) because I am autistic and I really do want a better understanding of this one.
Again, I am sorry I am just looking for understanding, who here is they? And what are the violations they made?
Edit: I know on the Internet it is very hard to convay intent, but I really am not asking these questions out of spite or as an argument. I have some trouble understanding nuance and I have an interest in this topic and I am trying to better understand.
If it helps for me to state my stance I am unequivocally, opposed to "don't say gay" bills, the banning of so called CRT in schools, and book bannings.
I can't get a handle on the publication, I have never heard of it before, just looking through some headlines it seems sketchy. Also, I couldn't find a Masthead on the website, granted I didn't look long, but should you have too?
Sounds like Thomas found another precedent he hasn't had a chance at destroying yet, well except Loving of course, and the "this isn't the right vehicle" bs is just sour grapes.
Oh I get what you mean but I think the word is culpable LOL