Ajen @ Ajen @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

623

Joined

2 yr. ago

They're mostly just used for tamper-proof screws for things like bathroom stalls so people can't take them apart as a "prank" or whatever. The screw driver bits tend to break easily, which is usually worse than the screw stripping.

This is gold.

Por que no los dos?

And those aren't the only fruity slurs, either.

“Fruit cup" = a queer person

I thought that was a pretty common slur?

Nextcloud isn't SaaS, unless you're paying someone else to manage your server. Self-hosting is never SaaS.

It's far from the most desirable part of the state. Look at prices in other areas, like Honolulu or Kaneohe.

Right, that's true of cloud-based services, but not "anything that connects to the internet."

OK... I was just explaining why some Christians don't like Trump selling bibles. I'm not sure why your being so toxic.

It's just tribalism. Anyone who doesn't fit in gets grouped together (ie. a lot of these comments imply most religious people support Trump). Lemmy isn't immune to it.

religion and fear as the basis for its atrocities.

And christians are bad. Always have been.

You are a hypocrite.

You do realize a lot of Christians/Catholics don't support Trump, right? Lots of Democratic leaders are Catholic, like Biden and Pelosi.

Where did you hear that? Can you share a link? It's not entirely true, but it does apply to most IoT products.

How much software is standalone these days, though? It seems like most companies are shifting to SaaS.

Just to recap: nothing in the article you posted supports your point, except for a self-aggrandizing quote from some politician, so you're resorting to sarcasm.

Yeah, it's kind of like crowd-funding. The early customers get a great deal, but also have the risk of the company going out of business.

Yep, they'll probably stop updating the Affinity product and launch a new product line with annual subscriptions. Probably cloud-based.

Looks like it's last official version was released in 2007. Are you using a version from gimpshop.com with added adware/spyware? The wiki for gimpshop is pretty eye-opening...

I originally created Gimpshop, but I'm not the jerk who owns that domain and added adware & spyware to the source. Sorry about that. I hate that this guy is out there making my fun little project into an abomination.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMPshop

I do think I was correct in my read of the OP screenshot as indicating a desire to own and profit of the labor of a "person"—a position which should be examined and the underpinnings of which roundly rejected

My mind went in a different direction when I read it. It made me think about the Citizens United ruling and how legal recognition (or lack of recognition) doesn't guide my moral compass. And practically speaking, I don't think AI would be legally recognized as a "person" unless it benefits the ruling class and widens the wealth gap.

I also disagree with your judgement. There are definitely red flags in the post, but I don't think it's fair to read between the lines and jump to conclusions based on one post. It could easily be a satire account.

Check the terms? You're adding new terms after the agreement was made. I call shenanigans!