Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AE
Posts
1
Comments
588
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Most of the stuff that happens on the backend of any software goes on "without your consent".

    You clicked on a webpage.

    You were brought to that webpage.

    You weren't tracked, logged, or had your data exploited or anything. All that happened was Brave got an affiliate bonus.

    Now if the companies in question were angry at Brave for doing that, I could understand. But why should we, the users, give a shit?

  • A lot of people on lemmy don't care about bigots, crypto, or anything else until something they dislike because it's not en vogue is doing it.

    Some dude at Firefox donates $1000 against prop 8? I sleep
    Some dude at Brave donates $1000 against prop 8? REAL SHIT

    I'm not trying to get into the "everyone is equally bad" thing here, but with projects as large as these if you dig into the history of everyone involved you WILL find some distasteful shit, it's just statistics.

    There's a lot of "Brave bad" going around the Fediverse, and people trying to find reasons to support that emotional belief, and stuff like that annoys me.

  • Why was appointing Eich as CEO so controversial? It's because he donated $1,000 in support of California's Proposition 8 in 2008, which was a proposed amendment to California's state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

    That has nothing to do with the software. And that's a tiny donation. I'm not going to stop using an excellent tool because one of the guys in charge is a bigot. If that were the case, I wouldn't be able to eat, drink, breathe, make a phone call, or do anything really. There's a lot of people out there. Some of them are bigots. We should work to reduce their influence but we can't boycott literally everything. Every alternative to Brave has at least one bigot involved in it, I guarantee it.

    Brave’s replacement for ads doesn’t reward users in a meaningful amount

    Not enough 0, which is what you get without adblock. And I'm fine with occasional non-targeted and unobtrusive ads to help fund a service I use.

    Brave’s BAT was built around the cryptocurrency ecosystem

    Who gives a shit except crypto bros? And who gives a shit about crypto bros anyway?

    Brave was also caught up in a privacy scandal in 2020, when it was revealed that the browser was adding affiliate codes to some URLs typed into the address bar.

    Are these affiliate codes tracking you? No? Who gives a shit? It's more money for Brave, same webpage for you.

    That should have been enough to swear off Brave as a privacy-centric browser forever, considering the entire point of affiliate links is to collect data about the user and traffic source. For example, when you click an Amazon affiliate link in a web article, the publisher can see the exact products you purchase in the timeframe the tracking cookie remains active

    Brave blocks cookies by default. Unless they specifically made an exception in their own browser for these codes, then this carefully-worded paragraph is just bullshit.

    Much like the rest of this article. Bunch of poo-flinging. "Brave is involved in crypto, here's all the bad things crypto has done, that's why you shouldn't use Brave". Stupid guilt by association and a lot of hot air. Bringing a smoke machine to make people think there's fire.

    There's a lot of effort going into making Brave seem like a bad browser and I don't know why.

  • When he said "open mind" it was a joke. You don't choose who you're sexually attracted to. If you're not attracted to trans people, that's fine and is no reflection on whether or not you're a bigot.

    You may know this, but I've run into several who don't, so I want to clarify.

  • Asking to hold Sotomayor to incredibly high standards is a distraction from the issue. It’s in bad faith, it’s whataboutism.

    The article REALLY REALLY REALLY needs to include this point, because I could absolutely see Republicans taking this article and saying "see? The majority of 'bribes' are just technicalities, with the intent of helping children. The Supreme Court doesn't need oversight."

    What the article fails to point out is that Sotomayor is a Democrat, and Clarence is a Republican. One side is taking bribes. It's not a problem with the court, it's a problem with the party that has embraced corruption as a moral tenet.

  • Yep. My doctor told me about someone who had a non-24hr sleep schedule, so he always wanted to go to sleep at a different time. At least I don't have that. But hearing all the "do things in the morning, when you have more energy" type advice suck.

  • For me, personally, it's not because it triggers suicidal ideation - I agree with the research I've seen that suggests it's not a thing, or at least not a statistically significant thing.

    For me, the issue is that people who say they're suicidal get attention and sympathy

    For certain emotionally immature people, attention and sympathy is their #1 goal in life

    In addition, teenagers want to both be cool and different, yet be accepted by everyone. You can't NOT accept a suicidal person, because what if they suicide themselves? If you say you're suicidal, suddenly everyone HAS to be nice to you.

    All of this is to say that, no, all y'all dumb motherfuckers are not actually suicidal, you're just fucking sad, edgy, and boring, and you need to quit it because you're drowning out the actual struggling people.

    Every damn day I see it "waaaaah I want to dieeeeeeee" no the fuck you don't, you're just trying to sound cool. Grow up.

  • I have a sleep disorder which means I can't adjust to a DAY shift. It's trippy, I'm basically the opposite of everyone else. I still work days, because that's how you get promoted. But it's like working a night shift for everyone else. After a few years you adapt, but it's never really normal.

  • Yeah but they think "racism" is "saying 'colored' instead of 'African-American'". Like they totally fail to grasp the severity of Deep South racism. They think hardcore racism is something that happened in the past, that we as a species have moved on from it, and surely (surely!) hysterical accounts like this are just gross exaggerations.