Acinonyx @ Acinonyx @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

1

Comments

236

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's not choosing entirey randomly but it isn't showing us anything that couldn't have possibly existed.

No it's showing us anything the creators of the AI want us to see. It won't generate ugly people because the creators used much more attractive people to train the AI. Also, you won't see what your typical Scot looked like in the 1820s, because the creators made the AI change the prompt to add diversity.

of course it's possible, but like the AI said, it didn't generate a pic of Scots from the 1820s, it made a pic of Scots from the 1820s with added diversity. the user didn't want this but the AI changed the prompt.

If I wanted a pic of African people from the 1820s I wouldn't like forced diversity whites in that pic either.

no stop you're not supposed to think about it

test

yeah but why is the woman there?

Impressive, very nice. Now let's do Thor love and thunder.

I also posted this on Reddit

how about you don't?

wet.

isn't twitter banned in china? what does the ccp say to him using it regardless?

can you make the emoji bigger? I almost didn't gave me eye cancer the second I looked at the meme

>>tumblr

this but with women

I use Firefox/Librewolf and never had any problems

based coomer

I regret nothing

wtf the media made the rapist look bad

is spinning a good trick?

Also why I throw the whole thing out and just call us all something else.

true equality would either be just '+', without any letters, or including every letter, which seems impossible.

or like you said, something completely else. I personally like - hear me out - 'alphabet people'. I understand that rightoids use this term as an insult so it isn't usable, which is a shame, because apart from its negative connotation it has a few nice upsides:

• sexualities/genders are being abbreviated by single letters already and since the alphabet contains all letters, everyone is included
• 'people' is completely neutral towards everyone as well