Basic Glitch @ AcidicBasicGlitch @lemm.ee

I write a blog that focuses on public information, public health, and polic

---

Read more

Posts

134

Comments

367

Joined

4 mo. ago

Yeah it was a dumb thing to say, that's the point

Have you never seen a dystopian scifi movie? If this administration somehow attempted to time travel, you don't think the world would look exactly like it does now?

I mean, if we are to go by Kratsios' speech, it would appear they are just the first brave and innovative enough to take advantage of technology already existing but intentionally weighed down by regulations. This timeline being a result of their brave innovation makes a lot of sense.

Maybe in your house, but in the White House, I'm not so sure. Mr. Kratsios holds a political science degree (with a focus on Hellenic studies) and appears to have no hard science qualifications.

No joke, he was actually Trump's acting director of OSTP during his first administration. During that time, people were critical of him because he lacked any qualifying experience in science.

Democratic members of the House actually wrote a letter begging Trump to pick a real science advisor to avoid a potential disaster. Trump eventually picked a meteorologist as his official science advisor several months later. If not for Anthony Fauci's meddling, those two would have been solely responsible for handling the COVID pandemic under Trump.

Just to be clear, the point is that Kratsios seemed to be making a sciencebro sales pitch about U.S. innovation under Trump, but given how delusional and unethical this administration has already been when it comes to making a name for U.S. tech supremacy, people took it seriously.

Wasn't expecting such a weirdly strong reaction to pointing this out, but yikes.

You just gave me a mental image of the dumbest BTFII reboot

Nope. But given our elite technologist leaders often have some dangerous ideas about innovation and "improvements to society," that don't quite align with reality, I can't say I blame people for worrying they might actually try.

I would make an inappropriate Ted Kaczynski joke if I didn't know everything we do is being constantly monitored at all times by a bunch of turds with zero sense of humor.

I'm just wondering how Trump squares an explanation for this with the fact that we're in a technology war with China. Why would we make ourselves more vulnerable to them?

I guess to clarify, it seems easier for Trump to make the argument to his base that everything he does to make us more vulnerable to Russia shouldn't really be a big deal bc he has so much respect and trust for Putin.

Most people (myself included) don't really know about this program, but if cutting funding makes us more vulnerable to China and other bad actors, it seems like a point more Americans should be made aware of.

They're doing so much of this shit quietly, but when you start to put each piece together it should be frightening to anyone that doesn't believe Russia is our BFF.

In late Feb, just after the whole Zelenskyy White House visit, Hegseth issued an order to Cyber Command to halt all planning against Russia including cybersecurity offensive strategies.

He gave the order to Commander Timothy Haugh, who is also head of the National Security Agency. Haugh told the outgoing director of operations, and cyber command begun putting together an official document of why this is a very bad idea.

I missed this completely until yesterday, but it turns out that Haugh and his NSA deputy were both suddenly ousted from their positions less than 2 weeks ago.

No reason was given they were just told "your services are no longer required." Apparently Laura Loomer requested Trump have them removed and made some vague accusations against them bc they had been installed under Biden.

I admit I hadn't heard of CVE program before today. Since we are BFFs now and Russia is "totally not a threat" to the U.S., I guess it's supposed to be ok because friends share everything. But wouldn't this also make us incredibly more vulnerable to China and any other country?

Doesn't mean people shouldn't still sue and bleed that fuck dry like he's bleeding everyone else.

You know how we can't even get the most basic shit right, like a list of names? What if you invested $500 billion to let us turn every fucking aspect of life into some automated bullshit without the possibility of human reasoning available as an option to correct any mistakes?

Sounds amazing right? We knew you would love it. That's why we're the elite technologists.

That's not really grinding though. Grinding is when you do what you have to do to survive. Rich people getting richer, and still having an insatiable appetite for power and money is just a maladaptive attempt to feel more secure and in control while dissociating from personal and emotional issues they never learned how to properly handle.

Yeah Daddy issues. That is learned behavior. They need therapy. And let's not lump grinding with that other shit. They may not have been born billionaires, but they were all born into some level of comfort. There are no rags to riches tech bros.

Again, therapy. Get to the root of that. Everyone has that to some extent, it's just normal people when they find themselves at a low point choose drugs, sex, food to spiral out of control with.

These fuckers are playing Westworld with our lives, and when they go into a spiral they want to bring us all with them

They're already free. Wtf do they want? Literally if they destroy society they just end up completely alone and miserable. Like self fulfilling prophecy bullshit, just go to therapy you dumb fucks!

Omg so just go to Mars and leave us all the fuck alone.

These bros are so goddamn stupid, and I wouldn't even care except they're going to kill us all in their delusional dumbass pursuit of a technocratic AI powered utopia.

And they're all so fucking miserable even if they succeed they will just wind up all alone in their robotic powered biodomes wondering wtf the point of existence is bc nobody is left to stroke their dumb fucking egos.

Here is a screenshot without paywall.

I've posted this additional information previously but I feel like it never hurts to keep as many people informed about corruption as possible:

Just throwing this out here to remind people that the Department of Homeland Security, DOJ, and DOD have all made some very alarming threats to employees they believe are speaking to the press. They also seem very eager to remove or weaken civil rights protections for everyone, including American citizens.

DHS Secretary Noem has complained that offices of civil rights within DHS interfere with the DHS mission on immigration. However, only two of the three offices Noem has attacked, deal with immigration

The third office is the office of civil rights and liberties within the DHS, and applies to all civil rights issues regardless of immigration or citizenship status.

Noem's attacks against Civil Rights Offices within DHS were made following statements that she plans to use polygraphs on ICE employees

You should be aware that many current ICE employees are federal employees who were removed from previous positions and have been diverted to ICE.

Diversion of federal employees is seen by many as a highly politicized move that first began in early February and seemed to be a blatant act of retaliation for January 6th investigations. Like a punishment for federal employees that they couldn't force to quit or legally fire.

Despite the fact that polygraphs are known to have high false positives rates, Noem said she plans to use polygraphs to root out individuals leaking information to the press. Noem's threat was followed by similar threats made against employees of the Dept. of Justice and Dept. of Defense.

Basically they are trying to crack down on dissent. Federal employees are witnessing them violate the law from the inside, and trying to warn the country what they are doing.

I'll be honest, seeing this sudden shift to openness talking about this when knowing how controlled the narrative is even here, makes me think this might actually be part of the narrative they're now trying to push.

I could definitely be wrong about that, but I've seen this brought up here a few times and even last night there was an AskReddit about what Americans would feel is the final straw to have Trump removed from power.

I actually was talking about this in a post a few days ago. If Vance suddenly succeeded Trump as president, it would not fix anything, and it would likely make things much worse