20% of Americans support boycott of firms aligning themselves with Trump agenda
AbnormalHumanBeing @ AbnormalHumanBeing @lemmy.abnormalbeings.space Posts 87Comments 261Joined 4 mo. ago

how can i shut down a dark web site?
im sorry that i sound like trolling i hoped that it doesnt sound like that
The dilemma is: it's impossible to tell from the outside, which is why I try to give advice while not indulging potential troll interests (e.g. spreading the post and forum as much as possible, creating concern). If you truly are in that situation, I don't envy you, because of course part of those trolls' interest is also to make things as hard as possible for people that really are caught up in it.
So, sadly, I don't have any personal experience concerning giving tips to journalists. Looking up "giving anonymous tips to journalists" on DuckDuckGo gives a few potential links, though most are directed at whistleblowers in administration and corporations:
https://freedom.press/digisec/blog/sharing-sensitive-leaks-press/ - this is a guide that seems to go through things to consider pretty well. If you do your own search, you will find links to specific outlets as well, for example Reuters here and the NYT here. If you have reason to believe, that the US altogether is not a good idea, European outlets are also always able to understand English material, of course.
Again, I have my doubts, and sadly there is little to remove them, and I wouldn't want you to doxx yourself. If you really are in that situation, just know that the downvotes and potential removal are not an indication of judgement of you, personally.
If you want to ask about something like this in the future, best try to hide anything sensitive behind spoiler tags or content warnings where available and not post links to the forum in any way openly - reduct the onion link itself for example, and only keep it available to people you trust to not spread it in malicious ways. And only show the topic list behind a disclaimer, of how this can be disturbing to read - those warnings aren't there for censorship, but to protect victims/survivors of abuse, which is precisely, why it is a troll tactic to try and spread them without such warnings/disclaimers.
how can i shut down a dark web site?
Sadly, it is hard to say if you are serious, or if this post is made by a troll, who wants to spread disturbing material for the sake of hurting people. The latter assumption is also the most likely explanation, why it was removed. Again, if you are serious, this is a catch-22, but do not spread this impulsively, this also goes to anyone reading this wanting to share it randomly out of concern. Firstly, you will have to add Content Warnings, the video you linked and topics discussed alone are enough to cause serious PTSD triggers. This, again, would be another factor why it gets removed (and why a troll wants to spread it).
Again: I am going to treat this like in good faith, even though I am aware that a troll wanting to perversely spread the fucked up shit happening to revel in the power and untouchability is sadly the more likely option. The "billionaire friends" are, for example, a bit sus in how the sentence goes.
In theory: Depending on where you live, the police and such would be the first to go to. If you have reason to assume that this will put you in danger, even an anonymous tip to journalists can help (including the material you posted here, but not in a semi-public forum, where it will reasonably be seen as trolling). I am sadly, no expert on who exactly to contact, but neither you, nor random internet people, should be the people handling this. That is what investigative Journalism flanked by therapists to help them go through shit like that is for.
Speaking of therapists, that would be another first line of people to talk to.
Sadly, speaking from my own experience from watching journalists in Germany investigating forums like that - the police often just let them stay up, partly out of incompetence, partly out of wanting the next success in catching people, instead of preventing forums to exist to begin with.
Now, again, I am here assuming you are serious and in good faith here, maybe against my better judgement, but to the other people coming across this post: Don't get concerned into spreading this post simply "as is" impulsively. Chances are still higher, this is a troll getting somewhat off from spreading disturbing material.
Yeah, that one really isn't Linux's fault either, and both on Linux and Windows, it's always "exciting" to see which dev used which wild, new scheme for their config/save files.
As a European, I think it would be pretty funny if, after Brexit, the other parts of the former Empire joined the EU.
But at least right now, membership is probably more of a meme - some solid cooperation and shared institutions would be amazing, though.
So, a few years back, when a good friend of mine tried out Linux mint, one of the main reasons he didn't stick with it wasn't even compatibility or anything (although he probably would have switched to a rolling release as someone who values cutting edge updates). But what ultimately made him return to Windows was something, I have been scratching my head on how to best handle it: The file system structure ultimately being too much of a change.
Now, of course, if you are used to it, I wouldn't really call it better or worse - definitely more suited to what Linux ultimately is. But stuff like, "Where are the save games of my paradox games? Why is so much stuff in my user directory? Why is there no unified directoy for all the stuff I installed (including everything they use), like Program Files, but everything is scattered all around into different directories? Why was the path to my save games hidden in a dotfile-folder?" were examples of hurdles, where the current answer seems to be "you just have to get used to it".
Now, I am not pleading to change the standard, there's good reasons for it. But are there good transitioning guides from Windows to Linux, that do a good job at explaining the structure of the file system? Because I remember, myself, only really getting used to it months into my Linux journey all those years ago.
Ah, yeah, I keep being scatterbrained and impulsive when crossposting, and forgetting he sadly doesn't even link direct links in the video description, instead of just to the website itself. Will add the link to the lemmy post bodies at least.
Nicole endgame
Oh, that is almost comforting to hear, because a clear profit motive that can be linked to the original messages would indeed be pointing towards scam instead of weird stalker. That being said, it sadly would not on its own completely do away with the theory.
Nicole endgame
The current most likely theory of the people that dove headfirst into this seems to be, that she was a small streamer on peertube and other platforms (hence the many different webcam images, too). Looking into the chat of the stream on her peertube account reveals at least one person, that had all their messages removed by her. The linked accounts on the most common spam messages feel more like doxxing attempts, too - with ones like this asking for money most likely being copycats, as in the original messages and linked communities, there was a suspicious lack of asking for money or trying to start contact for a romance/catfishing scam.
This would all point to some kind of crazy stalker trying to doxx this woman for whatever reason, in a pretty weird way. Maybe they hoped it would get us all riled up and hating on her? Maybe they thought by just seeing her, we'd react in some way? Maybe they just wanted the feeling of power to doxx and intimidate her, and no real plan beyond that?
Whatever it is, it really looks more like creepy shit than scam shit at this point, from what I have gathered in the community research that has been happening.
Makes sense, it's most likely an ongoing arms race - I'm probably coasting under the radar a bit from running an instance with effectively only 3 people to target at the moment.
Some admins have been developing and sharing solutions, from regex filters to going down into the databases itself.
For my small instance and personally, I haven't seen any new messages in a while now, after adding this regex to the slur filter mechanism:
(.*(\n)*Hi.*[nN]icole.*[fF]ediverse [cC]hick(.|\n)*)
Sadly my brain is blanking which instance admins I should credit for that, but it was shared around somewhere.
(Also I’m still salty about Origin Systems in 1992!)
They are finally getting re-discovered by younger generations a bit more, but they are often missing from memes like this. Considering how groundbreaking their projects like Wing Commander and of course Ultima were, it is a true shame. They truly fell from the very top and slowly died thanks to EA. (And, admittedly, also in part mismanagement and not being able to overcome the prohibitive cost of physical media i.e. floppy disks and CDs properly)
🫡 Comrade Trump 🫡
Wow, you're right of course. I completely forgot kwrite still existed, tbh.
Not sure what this is about
If I were to give them the biggest empathy I can muster, they may just remove it as silently as possible out of fear of having to moderate the comments of bound-to-be popular post according to reddit's increasingly stupid rules of discourse.
Still unjustified censorship, very worrysome - but I could on an emotional level understand being fed up with everything at this point and just powertripping because "fuck everything, I don't want to deal with anything like this, I am not getting paid enough/at all".
I genuinely do a lot of coding in Kate, the standard KDE editor. It's enough to do a lot of things, has highlighting, and is more than enough when you just need a quick fix.
I am also still using nano when editing stuff in the terminal. Please, don't judge me.
Permanently Deleted
I wouldn't be surprised if that is true outside the US as well. People that actually (have to) work with the stuff usually quickly learn, that its only good at a few things, but if you just hear about it in the (pop-, non-techie-)media (including YT and such), you might be deceived into thinking Skynet is just a few years away.
It's good that you linked to their home instance, especially because it is canada-related in general, but just in case people missed this: The link I shared is of course already on a PeerTube instance (I run). Sharing gives you a link to the video as it appears on your home instance, and I guess I have been too lazy to pick the link to the original instance.
Here's a neat tip for Firefox (probably only Desktop?) users: There is an add-on, that redirects you to your home PeerTube instance and, if you choose so, also to PeerTube whenever it detects a YouTube video also being on PeerTube:
https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/peertube-companion/
I am in this picture, how dare you to dox me!
My girlfriend and I can use our 'interfaces' to connect to a multitude of people, I call it the "Fedilationship". 😏
Right? I thought that looked like some serious ideological, "but hurting business is too far!"-brainrot.
But the article is actually really confusing to me:
That means ~20% plan to boycott themselves, which is not necessarily the same as supporting a boycott. Participating != supporting. Not supporting would e.g. also potentially mean attacking people like the person with the sign in the article photo, or ruining a Thanksgiving dinner with a huge family argument. While supporting can also mean "I support the movement, but for this and that reason, don't participate myself" (that may be due to genuine dependence on some boycotted things, or just lack of motivation, or a feeling of not knowing how to, etc.).
Then the article goes on with a quote:
Again, that seems like 20% are actively boycotting, which is actually a pretty big number for a movement like that.
But then, there is another conflicting number just one paragraph away:
So, wait, what? Why are the numbers so significantly different?
Wait, that is yet another number, where are the 20% coming from even?
Also, I swear, maybe I am imagining it, but I think the article changed while I was typing this, because I remember wanting to structure an argument around them later using the "support" wording again, but now I can't find it any more. Maybe I was misreading, that happens to me at times, but it wouldn't be the first time a news outlet has changed an article while it was already live without a notice.
To anyone not wanting to click, here is the neat graphic with some more demographic info from the article: