Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
121
Comments
1,786
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Community Notes are good, but they’re never a complete replacement for paid work. And my second paragraph is based on some notable incidents on X; it’s not just “oh it’s only bad because it’s on Facebook”.

  • but how do i summon wondering at my own volition when i want it to instead of descending upon us when i'm trying to focus

  • just search it up gal

    is going to likely trust notes written by their peers

    How is that a good thing if a lot of these notes take content out of context or are just plain wrong, echoed by those who trust misinformation?

  • In a capitalist society, you get much better quality when you pay someone their living to do that.

  • Better than partners certified by the International Fact-Checking Network?

  • shocked and pretty is the face you're making

  • A little inflation is a good thing. The deflationary cycle is awful.

  • they gotta recoup them tax dollars

  • I mean, it does check the power. We all know how long court cases take—especially in higher jurisdictions—and at least this means Trump can't make some stupid unconstitutional executive decision that only gets overturned after 3 years.

  • Isn't that just checking the power? If there's no way for a power to check another power, that's absolute chaos. And confirmation by the senate doesn't mean the judge will listen to the senate's every single bidding. The only thing that makes judges "beholden" to the legislature is impeachment, and that's pretty hard. You may as well say the executive is beholden to the legislature. And it's not like the US ever had direct presidential elections.

    Judges' lifetime appointment system on good behavior is meant to prevent them from being chosen by electioneering while still reflecting the opinions of the populace through being selected for nomination by the president. Though under Trump, they're pretty much selected through internal election under the Federalist Society anyways.

  • Remember who's running DOGEfficicency

  • And the tokens would have to be analyzed from audio, which has to be recorded first. Held temporarily or not, it's mostly the same.

  • That Google blog also says the same thing except it's written by a human. I'm not disputing that AI can process audio data into ad statistics; I'm disputing that audio data is constantly recorded and sent.

    I interpreted Farts as saying that the device listens to key ad words just like it listens for "Hey Siri", and I asked how it decides which words to listen to. Each ad campaign has their own keywords, and if you want to personalize, you'll have to listen to all of the words from every campaign, which would be equivalent to listening to everything and would severely degrade performance.

  • I don’t see how this clearly AI-generated article about how we’ll have 1-on-1 conversations with ads has to do with what we’re talking about.

  • Technology @lemmy.world

    Yuzu is gone.