Skip Navigation

Posts
40
Comments
1,442
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Good idea, i submitted that to an LLM with context. Here is the result :

    The comment lacks direct relation to the discussion between the US President and French President, instead focusing on Macron's general diplomatic actions and a separate comparison with Trump, not addressing the specific conversation between the two leaders.

  • i'll wait and see : they already cancel at the last minute a month ago, i don't believe it anymore.

  • Macron interrupts to say to the face of the orange thug that Europe provided 60% of the money and clearly he is there for negotiations. As he puts it, it is russia who should pay back : first pay compensations to Ukraine, then other countries.
    Next a journalist asks the orrange nazi if russia will pay since they are the aggressor ... no answer + diversion + end of press meeting

  • There is no such LTE modem mentioned in the article, neither in images, so I think there is none. Yet, one image says WiFi...

  • Surveys result moving in the right direction. Thanks for these updates. Sorry for expressing doubt about one of your (survey) post in the past few days.

  • (...) challenges assumptions (...)

    No one else here at Lemmy has the slightest start of an hypothesis on how to go about these challenges. All they can do on this is criticize without having a clue.

  • So what did you find about this topic ?

  • ignorance is bliss, don't dive into this rabbit hole unless you are really, really, interested.

  • O.P. might be referring Hitler ...

  • Thanks for commenting on this ... i have been asking for such comments many times to anyone since about 2 weeks now.

  • (...) challenges assumptions (...)

    Their "assumptions" were repeatedly "challenged" on this, yet they still "assume" the same ... it's getting quite absurd.

  • Oh ! ... i get it thanks. Very surprised, i am though that so many users are contributing to such an old and insignificant tread ...

  • Once again i struggle understanding a simple English sentence. please help me :

    (...) who part computer.

    1st interpretation would be written differently for me ... i would write it like :
    "for those who are part human, part computer" so i would have to reject that one.

    2nd interpretation would be reading "part" as a verb ... like dividing something into parts. So : "taking a computer into many pieces"

    Since I'm not sure how this second interpretation works, i start doubting my capacity and believe there might be a third interpretation ...

  • .
    ::: spoiler inN enngrishh :
    Well ok maybe, but but but ... i struggle understanding English since i was born french ... so sometimes i have to, (like this once), decompose and recompose sentences to get ze meaning. :::

  • i don't know. Maybe this is what happens when reading English through a French mind.

  • This is encouraging since there is more chances to have developments in this area and in its direction, if it is indeed a common take.

  • Looks like you will have to contact the administrators of your instance ... maybe your instance has a community for support from admins ?

  • ... and from those two accounts you do not block specific users or block specific Communities or block specific instances ?

    ... maybe it has to do with language settings for these accounts.

  • Reading the plot of the film on Wikipedia reminds me i might have seen it once. This film ends on : "This was the story of Howard Beale: the first known instance of a man who was killed because he had lousy ratings."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_(1976_film)
    .