APassenger @ APassenger @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

838

Joined

2 yr. ago

These are not common names. A short period of time on a search engine will end many job opportunities.

And now they've pushed the SEO more.

"It is a well known fact that reality has liberal bias."

~Stephen Colbert

Edit: I know left != liberal, but the idea still seemed to play.

He's taking the territory early.

Others will be less willing to develop if they must compete with a loss-tolerant Meta with years (and billions of dollars) already invested.

I want VR and much of what he's got people working on. I just don't want it from them. Or Google. Or most tech bigs.

Privatized profits. Socialized risk.

They're different because more people are paying attention and he's finally on defense.

Biden couldn't get press that wasn't about infirmity. Trump only got passes. Things have changed.

I wonder if he wants that more than immunity. Or if it's immunity he's really after.

You seem to be arguing that because there's the possibility of being more obvious, then it wasn't full.

Your example doesn't include killing or enslaving people for their race. So it's not full racist.

Or there is no objective line, but semi-arbitrary lines and we all get to gatekeep each other's lines.

Because that's the best use of our time.

He's obviously racist. Let's see how he does as he continues to tilt.

As I read your first paragraph I was reflecting on FD Signifier's vid.

He makes you think and he makes solid points. Only found him recently, but I enjoy his stuff. B side and otherwise.

The 5th gets scolded by SCOTUS. That's not a predictor, but they aren't upheld as much as many think.

It's a gish gallop with a flourish.

The policy work is done anyhow, isn't it?

Now it's win election and implement time.

If she provides the direction directly to the person/people who are to follow that instruction, how is that now (now) a Constitutional order?

Asking theoretically, but I really don't know how that wouldnt be Constitutional. We already kill US citizens abroad...

Won't he just run for president until he's dead?

It's a cash cow and it has no real rules that matter.

I wish this was a pinned message.

Looked at post history and you aren't wrong...

This isn't high school language class.

You don't get to assign essay work and then mark a person down when they post a more cogent response than you but fail to say what you want.

They're winning and while I've not taken note of you before, your style is that of a troll - requiring others to do high effort tasks while you post low effort replies.

It shows poor faith and it's very poor optics for you.

Merrick Garland.

Now if only assets could stop committing all those crimes.

You may be right. Where I am is this:

• Trump NEEDS to win (for his own purposes)
• Vance has a lot of connections to Project 2025
• Project 2025 may doom Trump's run

If the race starts to separate, Trump is not loyal. He just requires it of others. And he's been rather successful with persuading others to view his treatment as unfair.

Edit: formatting

He may get dropped, I think.

We're in move, counter-move territory after Biden dropped out and everything coalesced behind Harris.

This is how I heard it, as well: "she doesn't know her place."