9tr6gyp3 @ 9tr6gyp3 @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

617

Joined

2 yr. ago

Prove that the sender of that message doesn't match the cryptographic fingerprint of Hegseth. If he didn't send it, then it wont match.

Signal allows you to verify all your contacts in the group chat.

This is so easy to solve. Jfc

https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007060632-What-is-a-safety-number-and-why-do-I-see-that-it-changed

The journalist just has to show the safety number of the person who sent it, and hegseth has to verify it with his device. They're obviously already in each others contacts, or at least are aware of each other's presence in the group chat. Its pretty hard to ignore some random journalist entering the chat since it alerts the entire group.

What makes signal great is, yes, privacy, but also the authentication of your contacts. You know you can't possibly be talking to someone else's device if you have verified their safety number.

Now of we can just stop the state from providing this information, measles will disappear!!

/s

Damn, are they going cross platform or something? Is the Windows Xbox app coming to Linux? How else are they gonna get my steam games in there?

The person i was talking to about it said that he doesn't want Project 2025 put in place, but also voted Trump and (as you said) said Trump "doesn't have anything to do with that".

When I went to talk to them again after the election, he had either deleted his account or blocked me after I ask about Trump appointing many involved with Project 2025.

Hes going north because he understands climate change.

Wonder why he doesn't want Mexico as the 51st state?

Or puerto Rico?

Or anything else South or across an ocean?

What if we all demand our employers for a tariff offset raise on our wages?

It would be a shame if some foreign actor could monitor Starlink internal networks.

Not entirely true. There is other sandbox software out there (such as firejail, distrobox, docker, chroot, any VM products, etc) although they should also be cautious about claiming to be more secure. Flatpak, however, is not considered a sandbox by some.

Care to explain?

More wins than they already won?

If your distro doesn't work unless you use Flatpaks, then stick to flatpaks ig. Its your system.

President of peace?

What is it about the MLS encryption that is dubious?

There are quite a few reasons to avoid flatpaks tbh.

• You have no control over the dependencies. A flatpack can include a very old dependency and there is nothing you can do about it. You are at the mercy of the developer.
• Many Flatpak applications available on flathub are not effectively sandboxed by default. Do not rely on the provided process isolation without first reviewing the related flatpak permission manifest for common sandbox escape issues.
• Running untrusted code is never safe; sandboxing cannot change this. It can be a false sense of security.
• It is generally not a good idea to run unattended updates via systemd, as the applications can get new permissions without the user aware of the changes. See this blogpost for examples
• Flatpak does not run on the linux-hardened kernel unless you do additional kernel modifications that could have negative security implications.

What are the benefits of flatpacks? Like why not just install the actual Tor browser on your system? The one that is released and maintained by The Tor Project?

[edit] Looks like the Tor Project does support this flatpack. Im a silly goose.

What weak link?

MLS is cool because ANY messenger can implement it and talk to another messenger. If implemented, Signal users could have an EE2E conversation with WhatsApp, or Matrix users could have EE2E conversations with RCS users.

The original creator of MLS has a messenger called Wire.

Wow! I wish I could learn from copyrighted materials as freely as OpenAI!

You know what's nutritional against measles?

The measles vaccine.