Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
77
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Can’t we though? All language is arbitrary at first. A person (or community) often names things, sometimes from pure scratch. The words “Kodak” and “Xerox” come to mind.

  • They’re gonna whitewash it, little by little.

  • It did! A lot of it was quite marginal, but on the whole it was all orchestrated nicely and worked pretty seamlessly.

  • I used to run a small business, and we did a great number of things (relative to our business size and industry) in order to facilitate sales. Every touch point was designed to minimize the friction between the guest and them spending money. Both subtle things and obvious things.

    The marketing started as soon as one visited the website (tracking pixels and FB for re-marketing ads) or called for info (we would try to capture at least name and email for additional marketing—always with explicit permission: “May we have your email address so we can send you additional periodic information?”). We had phone call flows and maximum hold times (3 mins).

    We retained detailed guest notes and information which we would use to tailor their following visits (manually; any kind of automation was beyond our technical ability at the time).

    I’d have to spend some time thinking of all the other ways we did things. Most of which we implemented in a Disney Magic sort of way, in the sense that things are just sort of magically happening without the guest being concerned about it.

  • The salient argument was that the source location from the animal is not the wing (it’s the tender) and it already does not contain a bone, he continues: “we don’t ask for boneless tacos, or boneless cars.”

  • That book, along with Brave New World have shaped me so deeply. I’ve read 1984 periodically and each reading reveals so much more than the last because I have new mental lenses each time.

    Definitely pick it up again and give it a punt.

  • “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” —George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-four

  • According to Space.com in July 2023, there were 4,487 active Starlink satellites. 26 represents just over 0.5% of the total constellation. Considering it seems like a swarm-type system, 0.5% strikes me as simply the cost of doing business.

    Edit: decimals.

  • The blurb here makes me think the main article is an “advertorial”.

  • The point of endless impeachments is not that they actually have merit, but that they are intentionally frivolous in order to undermine the tool and make it appear as though it’s only used in political persecution and remove its value and efficacy.

  • Collectively, I’d say we’re on a gradient ranging from denial to resignation on the stages of grief model.

    A lot of people means there’s a lot of social inertia before we see the change reflected as a species.

  • To give some perspective, that’s a little less than two Nazi holocausts per year for 100 years.

  • I prompted ChatGPT to write and adjust a linear Python script for a repetitive task I needed to automate. It took 30 minutes versus the 6-12 hours I would have consumed if I had coded it myself.

    It’s a huge force multiplier when used properly.

  • I do both, and it’s heavily dependent on what the purpose of the note is for.

    I keep a yellow legal pad and mechanical pen. Stuff that goes on the pad are usually the ultimate in throwaway notes. Scribbles that are wholly transitory.

    Then I have a digital note management system (Obsidian.md) and use it to maintain a personal journal and Zettelkasten.

    Some yellow pad notes might flow into Obsidian, but not always.

  • I work in a professional field and… you would be surprised.

  • Compensation and rationalization. C'mon. Your position is untenable at its foundation.

  • CaLm dOwN KeYbOaRd wArRiOr.

    You’ve got the projection and cognitive dissonance turned up to eleven.

  • “Bigot” is the word you’re looking for.

    Strong concur. Religion is fine, but there is no place for extremism.