Trespassing is against the law, yep. Doesn't look like anybody was disputing that or ignorant of anything you're talking about. The person above was correctly making a needed distinction; "the law" has been conflated with "company policy."
This is true, and a foundational distinction in law, which makes it unfortunate that so many folks think you're being pedantic due to being confident in their knowledge base on subjects they aren't educated in.
Didn't realize homie was an antiquated clock.
(Assumed the usage of Roman numerals, like in the references being made, in which case I don't believe the clumsy VIIII only used on old clocks would really be valid.)
Raccoon isn't shown with a good enough grip on it to be holding the weight of a real gun, and we want to arming the raccoon population. In this case, given the plastic molding seams, it's a toy gun; this raccoon is in training.
There is a big difference between criminal law and civil (tort) law. "Suing" takes place in civil court and is not a matter of actions being criminal offenses, violations, or "illegal," and tort cases have different burdens of proof.
You can sue someone for just about anything, hence the concept of "frivolous lawsuits." That wouldn't need have anything to do with a criminal offense, of which, no, "insult" is generally not.
I did look; there's no discernible doctor connection. Couldn't find anything about same lawyers either, but that seems more likely to be a true footnote in their histories.
The media wanted there to be animosity between the pop stars, but they were neither enemies nor friends. Jackson named his son Prince, but not after the artist. ¯(ツ)_/¯
Well they could have seen the same celebrity doctor in Hollywood once or something, but there were two different dudes responsible for their individual care when they died; Michael Jackson's doctor got 4 years in prison for manslaughter, and has no connection to Prince.
Good point well made. I think it's usually naive wishful thinking (for a "just world" that makes sense and is going to be OK, actually) that allows a liberal capitalist apologist to point to classical economics and say "see the companies are hurting," but the companies don't have feelings, and the owners and shareholders are feeling just fine.
Trespassing is against the law, yep. Doesn't look like anybody was disputing that or ignorant of anything you're talking about. The person above was correctly making a needed distinction; "the law" has been conflated with "company policy."