To speak more to the point - Geordi is asked by his doctor a few times (by different doctors) why he didn't upgrade to a more modern prosthetic. He preferred the visor.
Eventually, in the movies, he did switch - presumably his new implants finally had feature parity with the visor. Or he got tired of the visor popping off...
As the parent of a preschooler, he would absolutely say this. He didn't have the patience to sit through such a long movie at that age, but he'd play while shows are on, and he'd definitely catch any intense emotional or musical moments.
And he could certainly plot, if a bit hamfistedly! At a little before three, he'd come up with some excuse for me to leave the room whenever he wanted to do something he wasn't supposed to ("Mommy wants you!"). If that kid realized she'd been upset by the scene, I could totally see her taking that one step further to make others upset at an opportune moment!
That would be a massive improvement. I was thinking along the lines of expanded voting time and better remote voting options for college students and the like; but ranked choice would be a seed change.
There are some fundamental issues with our democracy that I think need addressed, but I don't think age restrictions or term limits would do anything useful. There are already mechanisms in place that are supposed to handle the case of age-related incapacity - these need strengthened, but that doesn't require an amendment. The other problem I hear this is supposed to address is out-of-touch representatives - which should be addressed by strengthening our voting process. Reverse Citizens United, make it easier for young people to vote, and you'll see an improvement.
I'm remembering that color blindness is actually really good at bypassing certain kinds of camouflage too. Which sounds like the two would pair well together in hunting parties.
As a 41 year old, when I call someone in their early-mid 20s a kid, there's no derision intended. Think about how you relate to someone who's 12 or 16 when you're 20 or so - they might be quite capable, even fun to hang out with; but their life experiences also give them a clearly different outlook. And, like as not, you feel a little more interest in making sure they're getting along all right (at least I do!)
As you age, that doesn't really change - but the "target age" where that comes into play follows you up! So at 26, you feel that way about people just coming into high school; at 30-35, about people getting out of college and starting their careers. My oldest kid is 6; and I feel this way now about most of the parents of my kids' classmates! Makes for a fun juxtaposition, when they have older kids and know more about what we're in for than I do :p
It can turn into something condescending, depending on the person; but I think it's usually more of a statement that "I remember being where you were!"
You know, your question sparked a little realization for me - I like some of the newer series quite a bit more than some others; but I love that we're getting such a wide variety of directions and perspectives on the themes behind Star Trek!
I've never found this sort of argument compelling. Yes, it's possible there's things going on we don't know about; and sometimes tactical and strategic necessities may require hidden actions.
Those actions still need brought to light as soon as it's feasible to do so; and I struggle to imagine what sort of strategic necessity would require this sort of stance for more than a few months, let alone the years these stances have been in effect. Not to mention the difficulty of keeping something on this scale quiet for this long. At best, things are more or less as they appear - the alternative is there's things they don't want their electors to find out.
One thing that surprised me in the article - I had no idea magma could be acidic!