Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TO
Posts
1
Comments
266
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I don't think it's bullying, because bullying involves tormenting them - finding what they react negatively to, and pushing on that. Here, you're letting them know that there's something you need them to do before you're comfortable playing with them. You might think of it as modelling how to protect your own bodily autonomy!

    For me, when my kids were going through that, I'd say something like "Ack! Don't touch me with poo hands! Go wash first, then you can climb on me!" It'd generally get a giggle, then they'd go finish washing up. You'll want to pay attention to their reaction whatever you do, but if you make it clear they're still welcome to play, I don't see how it could be bullying.

  • That seems like a pretty weak consequence, and not an intended one. Worse, it's one likely to be least impactful for the worst offenders - a megacorp isn't going to care much about fines, and the market won't see any danger to their investment in them.

  • I've been trying to avoid soap labelled antibacterial for this reason, and it's tricky to even find any that's not labelled antibacterial.

    Been wondering if they don't just slap the label on any soap, because it could be considered antibacterial by its nature. Apparently not?

  • My players ran across some Imperial guardsmen killing off skeletons, only for the orcs accompanying them to protest that they were destroying "registered cultural artifacts!" The orcs didn't have much, and they would leave their bones to their children to help them eke out a meager existence.

  • I think that would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

    People who live in an area should be empowered to push back against outside interests coming in and changing things to the detriment of the residents, like the HOA posted earlier that protected their forest and watershed.

    The problem is that this power is often turned back onto the residents. This sounds to me like hyper-local politics - and so the answer is to get involved and vote out the assholes in power, not ban the existence of the political body!

    (Edit) I didn't realize this, but some HOAs are controlled by outside developers, rather than local residents? That I can get behind banning!