52fighters @ 52fighters @sopuli.xyz

Posts

2

Comments

64

Joined

2 yr. ago

The debates will be hosted at Serenity Springs nursing home and will be sponsored by AARP and Geritol. Complimentary hearing aids and adult diapers will be provided to select audience members and the candidates themselves.

Find a major US newspaper who had addressed the debate any time in the past generation.

I think we need to have the debate. If you murder someone, do you owe your life if it can save the life of another?

The quickest and most painless method was invented by the French: the guillotine.

If anything, I think the botched nitrogen execution should throw concern at the suicide advocates who touted nitrogen as the ideal method. They were probably wrong.

Mississippi authorizes firing squad if nitrogen hypoxia, lethal injection, and electrocution are held unconstitutional or “otherwise unavailable.”

Oklahoma & Utah have similar rules.

Justice is giving what's owed. And that's a great thing to argue about: What did he owe? To the family, the victim, and society. The question would be easy if taking his life restored the life of the woman he murdered. But that's not possible. However I have seen arguments that would require his death so organs could be harvested to save the life of others who would otherwise die. I'm not comfortable with that but do think that debate needs to happen.

I'm pretty sure this guys's guilt was beyond dispute. States have so many appeals and checks on capital punishment that it is much, much cheaper to default to life in prison. The economic argument isn't noble but should be included in the debate.

The Alliance Defending Freedom video tapes a sermon by a preacher specifically violating the rule and send it to the IRS, trying to bait them into applying the rule because they are confident SCOTUS will declare the rule unconstitutional. The IRS never takes the bait. They'd rather have the appearance of a rule than no rule at all. As it is it is mostly self-enforcing on most congregations.

The Alliance Defending Freedom video tapes a sermon by a preacher specifically violating the rule and send it to the IRS, trying to bait them into applying the rule because they are confident SCOTUS will declare the rule unconstitutional. The IRS never takes the bait. They'd rather have the appearance of a rule than no rule at all. As it is it is mostly self-enforcing on most congregations.

Instructions unclear: Joined the Trump campaign.

8 hours of meetings and 10 minutes of writing code.

There's nearly 0% odds I end up with the same wife and kids twice and I hit the jackpot the first time around. Give me the money.

Sounds like the free market is at work. Watch as the property values plummet. Hopefully this reduces sprawl and commuter culture.

I use an app on Android called stealth to view Reddit but I cannot vote or comment. I'd like to see Lemmy/kbin grow enough that the niche communities move here.

Fewer parties might mean less chaos in Italian politics.

Still need to follow due process. If he is guilty (and he probably is), you've got to convict him.

I think due process requires he be convicted first. They really need to get to work on that side of the problem.

If he asks and Israel says no, that creates a riff that'll lead to a huge risk of increased attacks by various regional terrorist groups. It makes sense to ask when Israel is likely to agree under pressure.

If any of you bothered to read the actual document, it says no blessing homosexual unions or anything that resembles them. The media is reporting everything way out of context and you are along for the ride.

I would be okay with them being persevered by zoos. They do not belong to the general public just like we don't tolerate private ownership of jaguars, hyenas, and other dangerous animals.