3volver @ 3volver @lemmy.world

Posts

73

Comments

488

Joined

1 yr. ago

In a late stage capitalist system it's a national security issue to have a president in such a severe amount of debt. It should be a requirement to be personally debt free to be president.

Before I left I edited all of my comments to say "fuck u/spez". Very relieving to get the fuck out of there. I fucking despise the idea of working to make money for the rich, never will. If they ever create an economy that forces me to work, the only labor I will do is to make sure they never feel comfortable again.

I'm glad you agree, but yea I guess I shouldn't expect this to be an unpopular opinion on Lemmy, the niche small unpopular website on the internet.

I'm glad that the moderator of an extremely liberal niche community on an unpopular website agrees.

You know what could also limit global heating? If the fucking wealthy stopped flying in their private jets and stopped cruising in their yachts and stopped buying their 3rd house. Focus on the solutions. Subsidize green energy, tax the oil companies, ban private jets, etc. You know, things that would have an actual impact.

That's not even the argument which was being made if that's what you're implying.

Their argument is simply: why is alcohol legal if it's much more harmful?

Legalization is the first step in harm reduction. While it is still illegal it is much harder for people get help.

https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI

Our judicial system is designed to be weak against the wealthy, here's a clear example. They'd never give someone poor such a break.

Good, while we're at it let's cancel all their diplomatic visits and stop giving them money.

Yet they're still able to put those stupid fucking recycling labels on their products as if it's recycled.

Yea that's how the 1% wanted it to be, they got it.

Regardless what happens trump is going to claim the election was rigged anyway.

Technically not if we're getting into semantics. The English language is always interesting to investigate, and trump is very good at dog whistling using this language.

"finish up" implies to take action quickly to finish the initial goals, such as to attack even stronger and faster to take territory in a short amount of time.

Example: "Finish up your dinner and you can have dessert."

"stop" implies to end immediately with no further action, such as a withdrawal or immediate cease fire.

Example: "Stop the car, I want to get out!"

Not a single time has trump said "stop" the violence in Gaza, not once.

It's never a worker shortage, it's a reasonable wage shortage.

Nothing you've written amounts to an argument. Your appeals to tradition are a logical fallacy. I suggest you read about the Connecticut Compromise and stop writing unnecessary insults which do nothing productive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_Compromise

It was designed that way for a reason.

This is never a good argument.

Each 1 Wyoming voter is worth about 67 Californians in the senate due to the fact that California has about 67 times the population but still only 2 senators.

38,940,231 Californians / 576,851 Wyomingites = ~67.5 ratio