Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AW
Posts
4
Comments
80
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It would mean the diminishing of market share of proprietary US software and hardware.

    Linux and *BSD run on RISC-V. RISC-V devices will be shipped with an open source OS and apps. Android users won't even notice / care about what chip is inside their tech.

    And it puts app lock-in to the test.

    • BRICS nations are going RISC-V - for varied reasons - as quickly as they can (and the EU may well follow suit).
    • China is a huge producer - if not THE biggest manufacturer - of electronics.

    Those two points alone suggest a RISC-V revolution, in BRICS and 3rd-World economies, who like cheaper goods. RISC-V cores have been used in microcontroller roles for a while now, and we're now seeing RISC-V chips being used as primary processors.

  • How far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?

    RISC-V is open specification for processor design, and some Cpus, like T-Head's C910 are published designs. The Roma laptop uses a SoC based on that, though I don't suppose it's readily available. There's also an SBC - the Lichee Pi 4A, and a tablet from Sipeed... But all these devices are cutting edge, and probably not for the general consumer quite yet.

  • "WhatsApp and Signal have both threatened to quit the UK market over this demand."

    I'm curious - how would that be done in practice?

    And wouldn't it just mean that people would adopt another protocol, like Tox or Matrix, in stead?