You're rewriting history. People stayed home because they refused to vote for genocide, and that's what Democrats offered unapologetically. You don't get to blame the voter for not choosing between genocide or genocide plus, you're not morally superior for voting for Harris.
Palestinians want a free Palestine from the river to the sea, where everyone is free. Israelis want a religious ethno supremacist state, there's not bad blood on both sides, you are both siding a genocide and history will recall your sentiment very poorly.
What specifically about communism are you afraid of? articulate it, or admit that you do not know or understand what you're afraid of.
And if that's the case, it's okay, it's okay to be afraid of the unknown. But it's not okay to insist that you know what you don't know is scary. Communism isn't what's scary, capitalism is, unless you're a capitalist, which you're not.
You assemble the same soulless food everyday and you actually feel fulfilled by assembling croutons differently every day?
Hey, I can't imagine the process not becoming muscle memory and for my brain to not be somewhere else completely, but you sprinkle salt off your elbow if that gives you joy.
In this restaurant, where the chef was replaced by a salad machine, the "chef" was a human salad machine before. There was no time to play with garnish and playing, they weren't serving Michelin star food. The term "chef" is used very liberally here, you aren't a chef if the only thing you cook at a restaurant is assemble salad that a machine can do to the same standard.
They were assembling salads, it wasn't a dream job.
They are overlapping areas, but they are "two completely different things". They overlap by sharing common goals, not by being interchangeable.
Anonymity to me means the message recipient can't tell who you are.
Right. And Signal doesn't provide that at all, it ties your private messages to your identity (phone number), it explicitly does not provide anonymity. In fact, it proudly advertises you as a signal user to other signal users that have your number saved. It allows you to post public status updates, it encourages you to save your first and last name on your account.
If a THIRD PARTY (the server operator) can ALSO tell who you are, that's a privacy failure, not just an anonymity one.
Okay? And? In this hypothetical world where Signal offered anonymity but still tied you to your number for other practical reasons, then you're be correct that it would be a privacy concern.
But they don't offer anonymity, they offer private conversations.
That headline is disgusting and classic straight out of the manufacturing consent model. Most people don't read past headlines, and the headline implies there's a divide among Israelis, it tries to hide the fact that they are overwhelmingly and incredibly openly genocidal.
She's very well documented. If they revoked her visa, she's here illegally. That doesn't say anything about the legality of revoking her visa or the ethics of it, she's not an illegal person, but she's here illegally. And they'll use that against her.
Are you suggesting an alternative motive for Microsoft that does beyond profit?