33550336 @ 33550336 @lemmy.world

Posts

8

Comments

92

Joined

1 yr. ago

This is a good way to mess with motorist, I like it as a cyclist 😎

My grandma used to tell me that while trying to teach me reading and so on. I miss you babcia 😭

dude devastated americans xD

I was going to write something like this. You actually wrote about semantic order, but syntactically it is as much important e.g. it is easier to sort dates such as 2024-05-27 than 27.05.2024 in chronological order.

That's excentric. Soviet Union would never admit such things.

I wonder how Switzerland militia would deal with Russian tanks and rockets.

Uhm…no army?

After the Russian invasion do you really believe than all countries in the world will become peaceful and any of them will ever try to invade another?

I am from Europe, from country invaded by nazi Germany so I know well what means an oppressive use of army. But could you give an alternative to the army?

First, you try to defend your country. Then, you want to have some advantage for a safety margin. Then, bigger advantage "just in case". This military play is what is really addictive.

We fucked, we need 60s back (with all the mindset).

In a ideal word, sure, I'd too. But we live among fucking beasts.

Zionist = Nazi; Zionist == Nazi;

Do you mean the communism's ideal or actually existing "communism" of "anti-imperialist" USSR? I read about both and live in a post-soviet country.

If "in the sense being tankie" is not clear enough for you, I do not mean possible communism ideal, but I mean actually existing "communism", like in USSR, which, besides some social advantages, was a red authoritarism.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tankie

It is because communism (in the sense being tankie) is far less radical than what we actually need. It is just imperialism with some red aesthetics. This is not the way, this is surrender.

Good.

I suppose so, if some heater would be placed to heat the helium.

I heard about this law several times, but I always forget whether it is 'yes' or 'no' 😂

Yep, the problem is probably worse for big ones and the video implies that we need extra large airships to carry heavy weights.

Yep, the structure integrity is maybe a hardest issue here.