For basic stats, probably just htop. But you can set any of those status viewers as the shell of a custom user, and configure it to login into that user automatically for the physical tty1 (so the display)
They say/write "they banned for X, but I didn't do X", instead of "they banned me for X, but X isn't even forbidden", even though it clearly is.
As I said, the report itself is just a compilation of publicly known and collected information. You'd be essentially distrusting that 1 + 1 = 2, because the 5 page mathematical proof is no open to the public. Of course, the actual proof that 1+1=2 is open, but you hopefully get the point.
The VS is completely independent. There are no politicians behind it. Otherwise, the whole thing wouldn't make sense. Even your source says so.
The status hasn't been revoked at all. That's a common misconception. It's not being taken back, obviously. They are just not calling them extremist openly, until there is a first decision in the lawsuit. Just as any other lawsuit for eg. defamation, no matter which side is on the right - you'll first be ordered to stop openly calling the other party a liar or similar, or stop doing that by yourself. Again, your source literally states this.
"Someone on mastodon.social reported me for supposedly supporting the German right-wing party." [...] Even though nowhere in their rules it says anything about this even being any offence."
3: [...] Support for violent groups
They, openly for years, and now officially, are extrimists and their members systematically violent.
And I just noticed that, as so often with deepl, it first detected the german text as english, therefore translated (english)german to german, and malformed it, so in my working copy it read "meinen" instead of "mein". Should have double checked that, but >01:30 CET demands its tribute.
Extremist right-wing party. With substantial parts legally being called Nazis.
Even though nowhere in their rules it says anything about this even being any offence.
3: [...] Support for violent groups or events is prohibited.
Explains itself.
And which later turned out to be completely unsubstantial as many people suspected.
It's not. "Many people", aka. AfD supporters and the AfD themselves.
Oh, did he? He just stood there and claimed something. There was supposedly a great report with all the hard facts, but no one was allowed to see it. That's not much different from "Yes, I did my homework, but then she (sic) ate my dog."
(The original toot, translated from german)
Thing is, all contents were openly collected and sorted by 3rd parties already. The report is as relevant to anyone aware of any politics as the Principia Mathematica's Section 54.43 is for thinking humans in order to prove that 1+1=2. The only usefulness lies in AfD supporters being unable to deny the obvious.
Apart from rarely being the opposite of stable - randomly crashing -, I often find myself seeing news about "you can now try out feature XY in the newest firefox experiment/beta!" - and meanwhile I'm already using feature XY since months, without hiccups. Also, more power, similar to developer edition (eg. bypassing addon signing).
Chrome, as a kid, then FF. Then to FF nightly. On mobile, I also used DDG (mainly for the tracker block thing), and Kiwi, until FF nightly supported browser extensions.
wtf