Lucy :3 @ 30p87 @feddit.org

Posts

1

Comments

1,490

Joined

1 yr. ago

Elon Musk Is Probing Major Security Leak: ‘We Have the Best Technical Minds Looking at How This Happened’

That's right on the level of "True is False" on the Oxymoron scale.

Rule 1, 2

Epstein them

Only if I need to type a capital letter with one hand

"I never thought Leopards would eat MY Face", sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party.

M$ and Google "products" are also widely used, also by "smart" folk.

I'd guess that, like all tech that's highly locked down, it will be very hard to do anything with - like Apple devices.

So the only thing to do right now is - not updating.

Because, without an instrument to incite fear, religion would be useless for the upper class.

piped.30p87.de

And all other piped/invidious instances. You can sub locally, and everything is stored as a cookie in your browser (afaik).

So we need to be careful with upper- and lowercase. Meanwhile the docs: > settiings

Ollama is simple too, I meant that containers make everything a nightmare to maintain.

Tell that my grandma

Päncäiks

Also depends on the region. I believe for most of germany, the thick ones are (Eier)Pfann(e)kuchen, and the thin ones are Crepés.

Huh? I'm talking about existing code being in a dir, then initting a git repo there, creating a pendant on your hoster of choice and then pushing it there. Wouldn't cloning the repo from step 3 to the code from step 1 overwrite the contents there?

Never have heard of that, but in the case of you also having a Readme that will be even more complicated, I imagine. So just adding -f is the easier option.

The problem is that the hallucinating makes the entire performance worthless without another human expert checking the output. So essentially, they are nearly worthless, because said humans could create the output themselves in the first place. LLMs are just faster to output, but fact checking afterwards takes much longer then. And that's assuming people know that. Without AI, they would ask expert forums, and would get solid answers. With AI, they just ask the AI, and are likely to not question what it outputs. Which is most probably at least somewhat wrong.

If you want something intuitive, use Paint or pen and paper.

Yeah, a coworker (also a trainee) spent 2 days trying to debug some C# MVC thing. It took me around 5 mins, from having last seen C# code 7 years ago, to realizing that the quotes were part of the literal string and needed to be checked too.

Well he did literally everything with the internal ChatGPT instance (or so a coworker said, I don't know which model actually runs there). I asked if he wrote JS code, he said no. Well even though there was JS in the cshtml file, he technically didn't lie, as he didn't write it.

Tbf you have to do that for the first push, if a Readme file was autogenerated

"Developer"
"my" 4 months of "work"

Those are the ones easily replaced by AI. 99% of stuff "they" did was done by AI anyway!